Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

4 views

1 Answers

Dear Manager, 
I, Md. Mahidul Islam, officer, Public Relationship department, Muhammad Group Ltd, usually eat lunch at the office cafeteria because it is reasonable priced, convenient and it has friendly atmosphere. There are, however, a number of deficiencies which I think should be addressed. 

Firstly, although the staff tries to keep the tables clean, there are not enough workers at peak times to clear their tables themselves. Secondly, the dining tables and the chairs do not match in height. You should replace the tables or chairs. 

Thirdly, worse still, sometimes the floor is wet and slippery, which results in a considerable number of accidents. A colleague of mine slipped and fell last Friday and struggled to get up with my help. You should always keep the floor dry. 

Fourthly, if your employees overwork and do not have time to make sure it is possible, you should hire more people. If this still not possible, put on a sign to warn your guests of it. 

Anyway, I like your restaurant and trust you are willing to improve your restaurant. Please consider my concerns and suggestions seriously. Thank you. 

Yours Sincerely 
Md. Mohidul Islam

4 views

Related Questions

Precis writing: Ericsson and his colleagues then compared amateur (অপেশাদার ক্রিড়াবিদ) pianists with professional pianists. The same pattern emerged. The amateurs never practiced more than about three hours a week over the course of their childhood, and by the age of twenty they had totaled two thousand hours of practice. The professionals, on the other hand, steadily increased their practice time every year, until by the age of twenty they, like the violinists (বেহালাবাদক), had reached ten thousand hours. The striking thing about Ericsson's study is that he and his colleagues couldn't find any “naturals” musicians who floated effortlessly to the top while practicing a fraction of the time their peers did Nor could they find any "grinds". people who worked harder than everyone else, yet just didn't have what it takes to break the top ranks. Their research suggests that once a musician has enough ability to get into a top music school, the thing that distinguishes (দু'টি জিনিসের মধ্যে পার্থক্য শোনা, দেখা, বোঝা) one performer from another is how hard he or she works. That's it. And what's more, the people a the very top don't work just harder or even much harder than everyone else. They work much, much harder.The idea that excellence at performing a complex task requires a critical minimum level of practice surfaces again and again in studies of expertise. In fact, researchers have settled on what they believe is the magic number for true expertise: ten thousand hours. The emerging picture from such studies is that ten thousand hours of practice is required to achieve the level of mastery associated with being a world- class expert-in anything, writes the neurologist Daniel Levitin. In a study after study, of composers, basketball players, fiction writers, ice skaters, concert pianists, chess players, master criminals, this number comes up again and again. Of course, this doesn't address why some people get more out of their practice sessions than others do. But no one has yet found a case in which true world-class expertise was accomplished in less time. It seems that it takes the brain this long to assimilate all that it needs to know to achieve true mastery.Instruction: Write a summary of the above passage with an appropriate title in the stipulated space. (Precis writing)
1 Answers 11 Views