According to the Supreme Court verdict which articles have guaranteeing the Right to Information to Indian citizens and later made an intrinsic part of the Right to Information Act 2005.?

Right to freedom of speech and expression, Article 19
Right to life and personal liberty, Article 21
Both a and b
Right to Equality Article 14

LohaHridoy

4 views

2025-01-04 04:42

0 Answers

Related Questions

Under which of the following articles of the Indian Constitution, Supreme court of India acts as a Court of record?

1 Answers 4 Views

Which of the statements given below is /are correct 1. The idea of a common civil code is set forth in Article 44 of the Constitution of India. 2. In certain respects, the High Courts in India have been given more extensive powers than the Supreme Court. 3. The Supreme Court of India, the first fully independent Court for the country, was set up under the Constitution of India in 1950. Select the correct answer using the code given below :?

1 Answers 4 Views

Consider the following regarding the qualification required to become a Supreme Court Judge in India: I. He should be a citizen of India. II. He should have been a High Court Judge for at least 10 years. III. He should have been an advocate with the High Court or two or more courts in succession for a period of at least 15 years. Which among the above is/are NOT correct?

1 Answers 7 Views

The Second Schedule of the Indian Constitution deals with the salary and emoluments of various constitutional functionaries in India. Consider the following with respect to this schedule of the Indian Constitution. I. Part A: Salary of the Judges of the Supreme Court II. Part C: Salary of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha III. Part E: Salary of the Comptroller and Auditor General of India Which among the above is/are NOT correctly matched?

1 Answers 8 Views

The Central Information Commission (CIC) on Monday brought Indian cricket governing body BCCI under Right to Information Act. Now, this will enable BCCI to accept all the queries. Which of the following substantiates the given statement I: The cricket governing body BCCI is the part of the Central Information Commission. II: Under Right to Information Act, BCCI has to answer the queries. III: The cricket governing body BCCI was brought under the Right to Information Act to bring transparency in their administration.?

1 Answers 5 Views

The Supreme Court suggested the Centre make it mandatory for families to disclose wedding expenditure to concerned marriage officers. Moreover, it also added, “Further question whether a part of such expenditure should be kept in a deposit in the name of the wife.” Which of the following is the cause of the statement I: All the sections of the society fell prey to the evil of dowry. II: This judgment was made to ward off all the false cases under the practice of dowry. III: The judgment was made to regulate the amount of money spent on Indian weddings.?

1 Answers 4 Views

The Supreme Court struck down Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act that allowed private companies to access Aadhaar data. Which of the following could be the cause of the statement I: Allowing private enterprise to avail the user’s Aadhaar numbers will lead to the exploitation of data. II: The linking of Aadhaar numbers with mobile phones allows verification of mobile users. III: The Aadhaar act violates the Right to Privacy which is a fundamental right under the constitution.?

1 Answers 4 Views

The Chief Justice of India Dipak Mishra said, “Denial of self-expression is like death. Section 377 is irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary” and further added, “No one can escape from their individualism. Society is now better for individualism.” Which of the following could be the reason for the statement I: The verdict was in consideration regarding decriminalizing gay sex and scrapping several parts of Section 377 of the Indian Penal. II: Section 377 violates the different articles of the Indian Constitution - Article 14 which guarantees equality before the law; Article 15 which ensures that no person shall be discriminated based on caste, creed, and gender etc. III: Section 377 guarantees the fundamental rights of the LGBT community.?

1 Answers 6 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments. II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year. III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.?

1 Answers 7 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)