Consider the following regarding the qualification required to become a Supreme Court Judge in India: I. He should be a citizen of India. II. He should have been a High Court Judge for at least 10 years. III. He should have been an advocate with the High Court or two or more courts in succession for a period of at least 15 years. Which among the above is/are NOT correct?

Both I and II
Both II and III
Only III
Only II

LohaHridoy

7 views

2025-01-04 04:42

1 Answers

AhmedNazir

Option 2 : Both II and III

The correct answer is Both II and III.

The following are the qualifications required to become a Supreme Court Judge in India:
- Should be a citizen of India
- Should have been a High Court Judge for a period of at least 5 years
- Should have been an advocate at the High Court or two or more courts in succession for a period of at least 10 years.
The SC Judges do not have any specific age for the appointment but they can continue to be in office till the age of 65 years.
He or she can be removed by the President only on the grounds of misbehavior and incapacity.

7 views Answered 2022-09-04 04:29

Related Questions

Consider the following statements 1. The Supreme Court is a Court of Records under Article 129 of the Constitution. 2. Parliament can increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court. 3. To become a judge of the Supreme Court it is necessary to be a citizen of India. Which of the above statements are correct?

1 Answers 5 Views

Consider the following statements regarding to the Supreme Court- 1. Integrated judicial system has been established under the Indian Constitution. 2. This unitary system of judiciary is derived from the Government of India Act-1935. 3. The provision relating to the Supreme Court in the Constitution is described under Articles 124 to 147. Which of the above statements are correct?

1 Answers 5 Views

Following are the conditions to select a manager for accounts in a company: 1, The candidate must be at least 30 years and not more than 40 years as on 1st January 2019. 2. Be a commerce graduate with at least 55% aggregate marks 3. Have experience of at least 10 years of accounts experience out of which at least 3 years in a managerial position in an organization. 4, Have secured at least 60% in the recruitment process. At 2 above. but has secured at least 50% aggregate marks in graduation and has secured 80% in there cruitment process, he can be referred to VP-accounts. In each question below the candidate details are provided. Read the question and answer based on the information provided. Don’t assume anything. Ram is born on 1 August 1974 and has a 60% aggregate in graduation -he has 15 years" experience in an organization with 5 years as accounts manager.?

1 Answers 6 Views

Which of the statements given below is /are correct 1. The idea of a common civil code is set forth in Article 44 of the Constitution of India. 2. In certain respects, the High Courts in India have been given more extensive powers than the Supreme Court. 3. The Supreme Court of India, the first fully independent Court for the country, was set up under the Constitution of India in 1950. Select the correct answer using the code given below :?

1 Answers 4 Views

In the question, one statement is given followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the conclusion, if any, follow from the given statements. Statement: “Shikha told her friend that after completing this semester of LLB, she will become an Advocate”. Conclusions: I. Shikha has completed her LLB. II. Shikha has become an Advocate.?

1 Answers 5 Views

Consider the following statements regarding the Governor: I. The governor should be at least 25 years of age in order to be eligible to contest for the post. II. Article 160 describes the qualification required to become the Governor. III. The Governor should be a citizen of India. Which among the above is/are correct?

1 Answers 5 Views

The Sunni Waqf Board on Friday urged the Supreme Court not to allow the Centre or the Uttar Pradesh government to take partisan sides in the Ayodhya title suit. The UP government cannot go back on its neutrality, senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan told a three-judge bench headed by CJI Dipak Misra. Dhavan was alluding to the fact that the UP government had maintained its silence on the issue during the earlier state regimes. Which of the following can be logically inferred from the statement above?

1 Answers 4 Views

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. Some men are hardworking. II. No blue is a advocate. III. Some blue are men. Conclusions: I. Some blue are hardworking. II. Some men are advocate. III. Some blue are not hardworking. IV. Some men are not advocate.?

1 Answers 4 Views

In each of the following question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusion logically follows the given statements. Statements: I. All men are scholars. II. Some scholars are advocate. Conclusions: I. All scholars are men. II. Some men are advocate. III. No men is advocate.?

1 Answers 5 Views

এক্সাম দিয়ে মেধা যাচাই করুন

Job Preparation (1125)

Admission (754)

এসএসসি (10)

এইচএসসি (5)