Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

  1. Article 75 - it gives power to the President to appoint the Prime Minister

  2. Article 356 - it gives the President power to dismiss a state government

  3. Article 76 - it gives powers to the President to frame rules for business transactions of the Union Government

  4. Article 108- it gives powers to the President to frame rules of procedure for joint sittings of the two houses of the Parliament

4 views

1 Answers

Option 3 : Article 76 - it gives powers to the President to frame rules for business transactions of the Union Government

  • Article 76:Appointment of Attorney General for India.
    Article 77 - It gives powers to the President to frame rules for business transactions of the Union Government.
  • Article 75 - It gives power to the President to appoint the Prime Minister, who is the head of the Council of Ministers
  • Article 356 - It gives the President the power to dismiss a state government when it cannot be conducted in accordance with the Constitution. President can assume direct authority (President’s Rule).
  • Article 108- It gives powers to the President to frame rules of procedure for joint sittings of the two houses of the Parliament and for the communication between the houses.
4 views

Related Questions

In the following question, there are six sentences marked S1, S6, P, Q, R and S. The positions of S1 and S6 are fixed. Choose one of the options given below which would be the most logical sequence of the sentences in the passage. S1- Indian democracy is held up by three pillars – the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. P- Each system is complementary to the other two, at the same time acting as checks and balances to them. Q- As per the Constitution of India, the judiciary is the most independent out of the three and is given a wide range of powers so that it is capable of offering justice freely and fairly. R- The Indian judiciary’s role has become evident in the last few years because of the scams brought to light that involved bureaucrats and many political leaders. S- Scams such as the Fodder scam, the Hawala scam, and the Telecom scandal involved charges of corruption by some of the top leaders of the land. S6- While some were acquitted, many more are still being tried.?
1 Answers 4 Views
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.?
1 Answers 4 Views