Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

What does the hypothesis of social comparison theory indicate?

What does the hypothesis of social comparison theory indicate? Correct Answer Top and bottom comparison

Social comparison theory was developed in 1954 by psychologist Leon Festinger. Social comparison theory is the idea that individuals determine their own social and personal worth based on how they stack up against others. 

Important Points The hypothesis of Social Comparision theory:

  • The social comparison process involves people coming to know themselves by evaluating their own attitudes, abilities, and traits in comparison with others.
  • There are two kinds of social comparison namely upward social comparison and downward social comparison or we can say it "top and bottom comparison".
  • Upward Social or Top Comparison
    • This takes place when we compare ourselves with those who we believe are better than us.
    • These upward comparisons often focus on the desire to improve our current status or level of ability.
    • We might compare ourselves to someone better off and look for ways that we can achieve similar results.
  • Downward or Bottom Social Comparison
    • This takes place when we compare ourselves to others who are worse off than us.
    • Such downward comparisons are often centered on making ourselves feel better about our abilities or traits.

Therefore, the hypothesis of social comparison theory indicates a top and bottom comparison.

Related Questions

A college/university teacher plans to test his/her substantive research hypothesis in a major project. Which of the following statements are considered relevant in this regard? A. Substantive research hypothesis has to clearly specify the relationship among variables B. Research hypothesis may be directed at finding out differential effects or relationships C. Null hypothesis should be formulated beforehend D. There is direct support available for testing the substantive research hypothesis E. The final decision on the research hypothesis may be reached indirectly by deciding the fate of the Null hypothesis Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
When a particular ‘statistics’ in a research situation is evidently declared to be significant, which of the following decisions will be considered tenable ? A. Null hypothesis is rejected B. Alternative hypothesis is accepted C. Null hypothesis is accepted D. Alternative hypothesis is rejected E. Null hypothesis along with the alternate hypothesis are accepted. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
A research scholar finds through statistical analysis that the value of 't' is significant. What decision is warranted on the basis of this hypothesis? A. The Null hypothesis should be rejected B. The research hypothesis should be accepted C. The null hypothesis should be accepted D. The research hypothesis should be rejected E. No decision is warranted in respect of the research hypothesis Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Given below are two statements : One is labeled as Assertion A and the other is labeled as Reason R. Assertion (A) : When Null Hypothesis (H0) is rejected, researcher's hypothesis (H1) is accepted.  Reason (R) : Null Hypothesis (H0) is a chance hypothesis and as such (H1) being true, the researcher's hypothesis lies in the domain of acceptability.  In the light of the above statements, Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below : 
Which of the following statements are true/false?
1. Trusteeship theory is also known as paternalistic theory.
2. The Philanthropic theory is based on the fact that man is a religious being.
3. The Functional theory is also known as efficiency theory.
4. Efficiency theory assumes that big business houses have the social responsibility and moral obligations of providing good working conditions.
In conducting an empirical study a researcher employs a non-parametric test for data analysis and finds that the ‘statistics’ arrived at is ‘significant’ at .05 level. What decisions will be warranted thereafter? (A) Rejecting the Null hypothesis (H0) (B) Accepting the Null hypothesis (H0) (C) Accepting the alternate hypothesis (H1) (D) Keeping the decision in abeyance (E) Rejecting the alternate hypothesis (H1) Choose the correct answer from the options given below :
Bayes Theorem is given by where
1. P(H) is the probability of hypothesis H being true.
2. P(E) is the probability of the evidence(regardless of the hypothesis).
3. P(E|H) is the probability of the evidence given that hypothesis is true.
4. P(H|E) is the probability of the hypothesis given that the evidence is there.
Below are given two sets in which Set I gives the named theory of Intelligence which set II indicated their main proponents and contentions associated with the theory. Match the two sets. Set I (Theory of Intelligence) Set II (The main proponents and contentions) (a) Multiple Factor Theory (i) Sternberg, intelligence can be taught and the classroom is the logical place to teach it. (b) Theory of Multiple Intelligence (ii) Cattell, intelligence is neither completely monarchic, nor oligarchic nor anarchic. (c) Theory of Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence (iii) Thurstone, intelligence is oligarchic in nature. (d) Coping Theory of Intelligence (iv) Gardner, intelligence is a capacity with component processes and should not be confused with a learning or cognitive style.   Choose correct answer from following.
Given below are four jumbled sentences. Out of the given options pick the one that gives their correct order.  A.within a social group, category, geographic region, or social unit.  B.Social stratification was a kind of social differentiation whereby members of society are grouped into socioeconomic strata,  C.As such, stratification is the relative social position of persons   D.based upon their occupation and income, wealth and social status, or derived power .
In the question below are given some statements followed by some conclusions based on those statements. Take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements. Statement: For admission to MA (Social Work) course, the condition of prior experience in social work may be relaxed by the Admission Committee to the best candidates. Conclusion: I. Some students of MA (Social Work) will have prior experience of social work. II. Some MA (Social Work) students will not have prior experience in social work.