Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Should there be a complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India? Arguments: I. Yes- this is the only way to sustain the present rate of technological development in India. II. No- the Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes significant part of foreign exchange reserve. III. No- the practical knowledge gained by Indians working in the other country help India develop its economy.

Should there be a complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India? Arguments: I. Yes- this is the only way to sustain the present rate of technological development in India. II. No- the Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes significant part of foreign exchange reserve. III. No- the practical knowledge gained by Indians working in the other country help India develop its economy. Correct Answer None is strong statement

Given,

Should there be a complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India?

Arguments:

I. Yes- this is the only way to sustain the present rate of technological development in India.(Statment is positive as compared to the given statement)

II. No- the Indians settled abroad to send a huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve.(Complimentary statement)

III. No- the practical knowledge gained by Indians working in the other country help India develop its economy.(Complimentary statement)

Clearly, none of the arguments provides a substantial reason either for or against the given statements. So, none of the arguments holds strong.

Here, none of the above statement is strong.

Hence, the correct answer is None is a strong statement.

Related Questions

Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India? Arguments : I. Yes. This is the only way to sustain present rate of technological development in India. II. No. The Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve. III. No. The practical knowledge gained by Indians by working in other countries help India develop its economy.
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should there be complete ban on Indian professionals seeking jobs elsewhere after getting their education in India?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This is the only way to sustain present rate of technological development in India.
II. No. The Indians settled abroad send huge amount of foreign exchange and this constitutes a significant part of foreign exchange reserve.
III. No. The practical knowledge gained by Indians by working in other countries help India develop its economy.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in future? Arguments : I. No. There is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle. II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.
Directions : Each of the following question consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument.

Statement : Should India create a huge oil reserve like some Western countries to face difficult situations in future?

Arguments :
I. No. There is no need to block huge amount of foreign exchange and keep the money idle.
II. Yes. This will help India withstand shocks of sudden rise in oil prices due to unforeseen circumstances.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: In the wake of globalization and digitization of the manner in which the business are conducted, the IT/ITES industry holds a significant place in the future business scenario. The Economic Survey 2017-18 mentioned that the IT/ITES services industry in India has scaled to around $140 billion during 2016-17. India today is globally the top outsourcing destination accounting for more than half of the market share. The IT/ITES industry has contributed around 7.7% of the country's GDP and according to IBEF is a key employment generator with a projection of creating 1.3-1.5 lakh new jobs annually. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. The Government has also provided considerable inputs to the industry with its various flagship programmes such as Digital India, Smart Cities, e-Governance coupled with a drive towards a cashless economy. II. The Government has been pro-active in considering demands of the industry and providing timely respite from the teething troubles under GST as well.  III. The IT/ITES industry is a labour intensive industry and a large scale employment generator. It is a common practice across the industry to provide various privileges and facilities to their staff in order to boost employee retention rates in their organisation.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government ban child labour? Arguments: I. Yes, because they are forced to work against their will. Lots of kids die because they work in dangerous environment. II Yes, because instead of making them work they should be educated as it is their basic right.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: In a first, the Centre has revoked the passports of five Non-Resident Indians on the charges of abandoning their wives abroad shortly after marriage or following disputes. Is the decision legitimate by the Centre? Arguments: I. Yes, This will force the NRIs to not return to India and face trial as they had been evading arrests and not responding to summons despite non-bailable warrants being issued against them. II. No, this will increase the cases of triple talaq and women won't marry NRIs. III. No, such decisions should not be implemented as they affect the economy.
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: As part of an effort to address the rising cases of divorces in the country, China's Jiangsu province has introduced a voluntary 'divorce test' for couples planning to end their marriage. Couples who score above 60 may be able to save their marriage, the civil affairs bureau said. Around 34 lakh Chinese couples filed for divorce in 2017. Is this sort of a decision/ test legitimate? Arguments: I. Yes, it is a valid decision and will give couples a chance to save their relationship. II. No, if a couple has decided to end their relationship, such a test won’t be beneficial. III. Yes, there is no harm in giving the test, if they want to separate their ways they can. But there might be a ray of hope that they decide to rethink their decision.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government ban Cigarette industries? Arguments: I. Yes, as it is very injurious for any person consuming them and causes cancer. II. No, forbidding them would mean that those people who work in cigarette industries would lose their jobs. 
Directions : Following question consists of a statement followed by three arguments I, II and III . You have to decide which of the arguments is a STRONG arguments and which is a WEAK Argument. Statement : Should there be only few banks in place of numerous smaller banks in India? Arguments : I. Yes. This will help secure the investor's money as these big banks will be able to withstand intermittent market related shocks. II. No. A large number of people will lose their jobs as after the merger many employees will be redundant. III. Yes. This will help consolidate the entire banking industry and will lead to healthy competition.