In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Specialty steel and wire ropes maker Usha Martin's decision to sell one of its core businesses - steelmaking - to prune outstanding debt, marks the rare instance of an Indian corporate borrower meeting its loan obligations through divestment. The slump sale is a milestone in the six-decade history of the Kolkata-based company, whose board on Saturday approved the divestment of its one million ton steel business in favor of Tata Steel for Rs 4,600 crore. Courses of action: I. Proceeds will be used to ‘first repay existing lenders of the company’. Usha Martin will retain a profitable wire ropes unit as residual business, and has plans to scale it up significantly. II. As part of the transaction, Usha Martin has entered into a five-year deal with The Tatas for sale of steel at market price to the wire-ropes business. III. Usha Martin is among the top four wire rope players globally. With oil prices going up and strong trend in demand in Europe, the Ebitda in the wire-ropes business has improved.
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Specialty steel and wire ropes maker Usha Martin's decision to sell one of its core businesses - steelmaking - to prune outstanding debt, marks the rare instance of an Indian corporate borrower meeting its loan obligations through divestment. The slump sale is a milestone in the six-decade history of the Kolkata-based company, whose board on Saturday approved the divestment of its one million ton steel business in favor of Tata Steel for Rs 4,600 crore. Courses of action: I. Proceeds will be used to ‘first repay existing lenders of the company’. Usha Martin will retain a profitable wire ropes unit as residual business, and has plans to scale it up significantly. II. As part of the transaction, Usha Martin has entered into a five-year deal with The Tatas for sale of steel at market price to the wire-ropes business. III. Usha Martin is among the top four wire rope players globally. With oil prices going up and strong trend in demand in Europe, the Ebitda in the wire-ropes business has improved. Correct Answer All except III
A course of action is something thDat needs to be done considering the present scenario in mind. From the statement, it is evident that Specialty steel and wire ropes maker Usha Martin is planning for disinvestment. Thus, the course of action must also be in the same direction, in order to strengthen the flow of ideas.
As a part of the initiative for disinvestment, both I and II can be considered appropriate.
From Course of action I, it is evident that the proceedings will result in repaying of the debts and Usha Martin is planning to scale up the wire ropes unit in order to strengthen the business. As it covers the fact that from the disinvestment, loans will be repaid and thus, will serve the given purpose. Thus, it is in the same context as the given statement.
From Course of action II, it is in the same context as the plans and the transactions occurring as a part of the disinvestment. Thus, it is also relevant.
Course of action III is totally irrelevant as it is a generic statement which states that Usha Martin is a top player in the industry. Moreover, comparison with Ebitda is not in the direction of the disinvestment. Thus, it can be rejected.
Thus, the correct answer is option 4.