In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Top lenders to power projects including State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Power Finance Corp and others have agreed to decide the fate of a dozen stressed assets totaling about 13,000 MW by October 10. At a meeting between lenders and top government officials late on Thursday, large lenders explained risks of moving power projects to insolvency court to disagreeing banks, most of which have smaller exposures, and sought to arrive upon a decision before the set deadline. Courses of action: I. Lenders were informed about rising electricity demand and measures being proposed by the high level empowered committee that is working to address issues related to fuel, discom payment delays and regulatory approvals. II. Banks with lesser exposure to stressed assets in power sector have been asked to come together and decide either to agree with the resolution plan or refer the projects to bankruptcy court rather than dilly-dallying. III. However, if the resolution plans are decided, it can create a favorable ground before the court to salvage at least some of these good operational assets from insolvency proceedings.
In the question below, are given a statement followed by three courses of actions numbered I, II and III. On the basis of the information given, you have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then decide which of the following suggested courses of actions logically follow(s) for pursuing. Statement: Top lenders to power projects including State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Power Finance Corp and others have agreed to decide the fate of a dozen stressed assets totaling about 13,000 MW by October 10. At a meeting between lenders and top government officials late on Thursday, large lenders explained risks of moving power projects to insolvency court to disagreeing banks, most of which have smaller exposures, and sought to arrive upon a decision before the set deadline. Courses of action: I. Lenders were informed about rising electricity demand and measures being proposed by the high level empowered committee that is working to address issues related to fuel, discom payment delays and regulatory approvals. II. Banks with lesser exposure to stressed assets in power sector have been asked to come together and decide either to agree with the resolution plan or refer the projects to bankruptcy court rather than dilly-dallying. III. However, if the resolution plans are decided, it can create a favorable ground before the court to salvage at least some of these good operational assets from insolvency proceedings. Correct Answer All except III
A course of action is something that needs to be done considering the present scenario in mind.
The given context deals with the fact of Top lenders to power projects including State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Power Finance Corp and others are planning to decide the fate of a dozen stressed assets totaling about 13,000 MW by October 10.
All the course of actions mentioned except III are relevant as far as the given statement is taken into consideration. Both Courses of action I and II perfectly capture the required measures or the steps or the courses of actions that must be followed in order to achieve the said motive or task.
As far as Course of action III is concerned it is not a course of action, it is rather an assumption that is been considered. As from the context stated in course of action III, we don’t get the idea that it is a course of action, it can be rejected.
As both the courses of action mentioned in I and II are in the same direction thus, the most appropriate answer choice is option 4.