Three students were caught cheating in an exam. However, when called by the Principal, only one of them told the truth in both the statements, while each of the other two gave one true and one false statement. Their statements are: Tiara: A: Chahal passed the chits. B: Karan brought the notes. Karan: A: Tiara passed the chits. B: I brought the notes. Chahal: A: I passed the chits. B: Karan brought the notes. Who passed the chits?

Three students were caught cheating in an exam. However, when called by the Principal, only one of them told the truth in both the statements, while each of the other two gave one true and one false statement. Their statements are: Tiara: A: Chahal passed the chits. B: Karan brought the notes. Karan: A: Tiara passed the chits. B: I brought the notes. Chahal: A: I passed the chits. B: Karan brought the notes. Who passed the chits? Correct Answer Chahal

Given conditions: 

Only one of them told the truth in both the statements, while each of the other two gave one true and one false statement.

Let statement 1 and statement 2 are correct and remaining other statements are not correct, then

Tiara:

A: Chahal passed the chits → True

B: Karan brought the notes → True

Karan:

A: Tiara passed the chits → True

B: I brought the notes → True

Chahal:

A: I passed the chits → False

B: Karan brought the notes → False

Both 1 and 2 statement, both Tiara and Chahal passed the chits, but in the third statement telling the Chahal not passed the chits.

Let statement 2 and statement 3 are correct and remaining other statements are not correct, then

Tiara:

A: Chahal passed the chits → False

B: Karan brought the notes → False

Karan:

A: Tiara passed the chits → True

B: I brought the notes → True

Chahal:

A: I passed the chits →True

B: Karan brought the notes → True

Both 3 and 2 statement Chahal passed the chits and Tiara passed the chits but in statement 1 tells the Chahal not passed the chits

Let statement 3 and statement 1 are correct and remaining other statements are not correct, then

Tiara:

A: Chahal passed the chits → True

B: Karan brought the notes → True

Karan:

A: Tiara passed the chits → False

B: I brought the notes → False

Chahal:

A: I passed the chits → True

B: Karan brought the notes → True

Both 1 and 3 Statement clearly shows the Chahal passed the chits but in Statement 2 tells the Tiara not passed the chits.

Hence, "Chahal" is the correct answer.

Related Questions

Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
According to Gandhiji, truth complies to which of the following?
Read the passage carefully and select the best answer to each question out of the given four alternatives.
What is Gandhian philosophy? It is the religious and social ideas adopted and developed by Gandhi, first during his period in South Africa from 1893 to 1914, and later of course in India. These ideas have been further developed by later "Gandhians", most notably, in India by, Vinoba Bhave and Jayaprakash Narayan. Outside of India some of the work of, for example, Martin Luther King Jr. can also be viewed in this light. Understanding the universe to be an organic whole, the philosophy exists on several planes - the spiritual or religious, moral, political, economic, social, individual and collective. The spiritual or religious element, and God, is at its core. Human nature is regarded as fundamentally virtuous. All individuals are believed to be capable of high moral development, and of reform. The twin cardinal principles of Gandhi's thought are truth and nonviolence. It should be remembered that the English word "truth" is an imperfect translation of the Sanskrit, "satya", and "non-violence", an even more imperfect translation of "ahimsa". Derived from "sat" - "that which exists" - "satya" contains a dimension of meaning not usually associated by English speakers with the word "truth". There are other variations, too, which we need not go into here. For Gandhi, truth is the relative truth of truthfulness in word and deed, and the absolute truth - the Ultimate Reality. This ultimate truth is God (as God is also Truth) and morality - the moral laws and code - its basis. Ahimsa, far from meaning mere peacefulness or the absence of overt violence, is understood by Gandhi to denote active love - the pole opposite of violence, or "Himsa", in every sense. The ultimate station Gandhi assigns non violence stems from two main points. First, if according to the Divine Reality all life is one, then all violence committed towards another is violence towards oneself, towards the collective, whole self, and thus "self"-destructive and counter to the universal law of life, which is love. Second, Gandhi believed that ahimsa is the most powerful force in existence. Had himsa been superior to ahimsa, humankind would long ago have succeeded in destroying itself. The human race certainly could not have progressed as far as it has, even if universal justice remains far off the horizon. From both viewpoints, non violence or love is regarded as the highest law of humankind.
According to the passage, which of the following statement is not true?