Statement I: The setting of the Contingency Fund of India is mandatory under the Indian constitution for unforeseen expenditure. Statement II: Contingency Fund of India is maintained by the Finance Secretary on behalf of the President.
Statement I: The setting of the Contingency Fund of India is mandatory under the Indian constitution for unforeseen expenditure. Statement II: Contingency Fund of India is maintained by the Finance Secretary on behalf of the President. Correct Answer Statement I is false but statement II is true.
The correct answer is Statement I is false but statement II is true.
Key Points
Article 267 of the constitution says that Parliament may establish a Contingency Fund of India.
- Setting up of Contingency Fund of India is not mandatory. Hence, statement 1 is false.
- The fund is placed at the disposal of the President and he can make advances out of it to meet unforeseen expenditure pending the authorization of such expenditure by parliament.
- The fund is held by the Finance Secretary of India on behalf of the President. Hence, statement 2 is true.
- It is also operated by executive action only.
- Parliament enacted the Contingency fund of India Act in the year 1950.
Confusion Points
- The term may express that the Setting up of the Contingency Fund of India is not mandatory.
- The second part of the statement is correct. The fund is placed at the disposal of the President and he can make advances out of it to meet unforeseen expenditures.
- Hence, overall statement 1 is false
মোঃ আরিফুল ইসলাম
Feb 20, 2025