Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Which of the following statements is correct about Wage Boards in India?
1. A Wage Board is a tripartite body.
2. Labour and management representatives on a Wage Board can be selected from industries other than the one which is investigated.
3. Wage Boards are always statutory in nature.
4. Wage Boards work on the principle of living wage.
Which of the following statement(s) is/are incorrect? 1. Wage Boards are tripartite in nature, with representatives from workers, employers, and independent members 2. Except for the Wage Boards for Journalists and Non-Journalists, all the other wage boards are statutory in nature 3. Second National Commission on Labour has recommended against the utility of wage boards Select the correct answer using the code given below:
Ram wage is 40% more than Krishna wage and Mohan wage is 62.5% of sum of Ram & Krishna wage then find Mohan wage is what % of Ram wage.
Which of the following statements are true/false?
1. Fair wage is above the minimum wage but below the living wage.
2. Living wage is the highest amount of wage proposed by the government.
3. Different states have fixed different minimum wages based on the skill set of the employees.
4. Fair wage works on the formula Equal Pay for Equal work.
Which of the following statement(s) is/are true?
1. The concept of wage boards was first enunciated by the Minimum Wage Committee.
2. A wage board is bipartite in character.
3. Representatives of employers and workers on wage board are appointed by the government after consulting the concerned organisations
Choose the correct answer:
In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement: (I) Wages are determined by minimum wage legislation in each country. (II) Increase in wage rate is the sign of growth in an economy. Conclusions: (I) Average wage rate signifies the wealth of a country. (II) Minimum wage legislation does not account wage imbalances.
In the following question, two statements are given each followed by two conclusions I and II. You have to consider the statements to be true even ifthey seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement:
(I) Wages are determined by minimum wage legislation in each country.
(II) Increase in wage rate is the sign of growth in an economy. Conclusions:
(I) Average wage rate signifies the wealth of a country.
(II) Minimum wage legislation does not account wage imbalances.
The average wage of a worker during a fortnihgt comprising 15 consecutive working days was Taka 90 per day. During the first 7 days, his average wage was Taka 87 per day and the average wage during the last 7 days was Taka 92 per day. What was his wage on the 8th day ?
A, B, C, D, K, L, M and O are researchers and are working in three different institutes, X, Y and Z. They are working in three different areas namely, solar energy, sustainable development, and rainwater harvesting for agricultural purpose. Not less than two or more than three researchers are working in the same area and not more than three of them are working the same institute. K is researching in the sustainable development in the institute Y with B who is doing research in rainwater harvesting. A and M are doing research in the same area but not in sustainable development and are not working in the institute Y. C is researching in solar energy in the institute Z, only with D who is working in sustainable development. L is researching in rainwater harvesting area and not working in the institute where A works. O is not doing research in the solar energy. Choose option for answering question, In which of the institute/institutes at least one researcher is working in the area of solar energy ?
One X wrote defamatory letter against Y, a copy of which he sent to the Chairman of the Municipal Committee and other for publication in a local newspaper in which it was duly published. Y sued X and the editor, publisher and management of the newspaper for damages. Subsequently, a sum of Rs. 5,000 was paid by the newspaper by way of damages to Y and an apology was also published in the newspaper. Thereupon Y withdrew his action against the newspaper but not against X. X pleads that the release of other joint tort-feasors amounted to his release also