Under section 62 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the implied terms and conditions in a contract of sale provided under the Act, can

Where in a contract for sale of goods there is no express or implied provision as to place of delivery of the goods, under section 36 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the goods would be deemed to have been delivered

A

At the place where they were at the time of sale

B

At the buyer's place

C

At the seller's place

D

At the place away from the seller's place

Implied terms and conditions in a contract of sale of goods, by virtue of section 62 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, can be excluded by

A

An express agreement

B

The course of dealings between the parties

C

The usage

D

Either (A) or (B) or (C)

Section 17 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, provides for implied conditions in a contract of sale of goods

A

By description

B

By sample

C

By sample as well as by description

D

Either by sample or by description

When the specific goods which are subject matter of the contract under the Sales of Goods Act have perished prior to making of the contract then contract can be enforced against alternative goods because the contract of sale of goods is otherwise valid.

A

No, the contract of sale of specific goods cannot be enforced because goods have already perished without the knowledge of the seller at the time of contract, and then the contract of sale itself is void as per Section 7 of the Sale of Goods Act

B

Though ordinarily the contract of the sale cannot be enforced against alternative goods instead of the contracted goods which have perished but the alternative goods can be received by the buyer from the seller if the value of the specific goods is less than Rs. 100/-

C

If the specific goods have perished before making of the contract, and this was a fact already known to the buyer but not the seller, then contract is not void with respect to claim of the buyer for alternative goods

D

A contract for sale of specific goods which have perished prior to the entering into of the contract for sale, will be void and can be enforced against alternative goods only if the buyer has possession of the alternative goods

A contract of sale of goods, on goods having been damaged/perished subsequent to the formation of the contract under section 8 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, can be avoided

A

Before the property in goods has passed to the buyer

B

After the property in goods has passed to the buyer

C

At any time irrespective of whether the property in goods has passed to the buyer or not

D

Only (B) not (A) or (C)

Where a contract of sale of goods does not fix the time within which the seller is bound to send the goods to the buyer, under section 36(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the seller is bound to send the goods, within

A

The shortest possible time

B

The minimum time

C

A reasonable time

D

The maximum time

Where the goods have not been appropriated to the contract and there is a re-sale of goods under section 54 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the measure of damages on re-sale shall be

A

The difference between the contract price and the market price on the date of breach

B

The difference between the contract price and the price realised on re-sale

C

The difference between the contract price and the market price on the date of breach or the price realised whichever is lower

D

The difference between the contract price and the market price on the date of breach or the price realised whichever is higher

Is it correct that in a contract of sale of goods under the Sale of Goods Act if the goods received are not as per the terms of the contract then the buyer in all cases has no liability to pay for the goods which are received by him from the seller?

A

Yes, he is not liable because no buyer can be imposed a liability for receiving contracted goods

B

Yes, he is not liable till he gives intimation in writing of acceptance

C

Yes, he is not liable if he has intimated to the seller within reasonable time that the goods have been rejected

D

No, he is liable because of the principle "buyer beware"

Under section 29 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, a sale of goods by a person in possession of goods under a voidable contract, can pass a valid title to the buyer

A

Where at the time of sale the contract has not been rescinded

B

Where at the time of sale the contract has been rescinded

C

Irrespective of whether at the time of sale the contract has been or has not been rescinded

D

Where at the time of sale the person retains the possession even after rescission of the contract

Where the price of the goods under a contract of sale has to be determined by the valuation of a third party, and the valuer fails or refuses to make the valuation, the contract under section 10 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, shall

A

Become void

B

Be voidable

C

Remain valid

D

Become impossible

Under section 62 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the implied terms and conditions in a contract of sale provided under the Act, can

Related Questions