Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Is it correct that in a contract of sale of goods under the Sale of Goods Act if the goods received are not as per the terms of the contract then the buyer in all cases has no liability to pay for the goods which are received by him from the seller?

Is it correct that in a contract of sale of goods under the Sale of Goods Act if the goods received are not as per the terms of the contract then the buyer in all cases has no liability to pay for the goods which are received by him from the seller? Correct Answer Yes, he is not liable if he has intimated to the seller within reasonable time that the goods have been rejected

Related Questions

Which of the following statements are correct. Answer using the given below:
(1) Ascertainment of goods for sale is done by buyer.
(2) Appropriation of goods for sale is done by seller.
(3) Distinction between ascertainment of goods and appropriation of goods that former involves lithe element of common intention between buyer and seller", whereas later can be a unilateral act by buyer.
(4) Property in goods does not pass to buyer till appropriation.
Where a contract of sale of goods does not fix the time within which the seller is bound to send the goods to the buyer, under section 36(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the seller is bound to send the goods, within
Propositions as regards the liability of the surety under the surety bond are:
1. The liability of the surety is mutually exclusive of the liability of the accused under his personal bond.
2. The liability of the surety is contingent on the liability of the accused under his personal bond the liability of the surety.
3. is limited to the amount of the surety bond.
Now which of the following is correct
Statement I It is a pre-condition of right of stoppage in transit that seller must have parted with possession of goods.
Statement II Unpaid seller can exercise his rights of resale when goods are in his possession.
Statement III Where property in goods has been passed to the buyer, seller can file a suit against buyer for recovery of price.
Which of the above statement(s) is/are true?
In case where the goods are sold by description by a seller who deals in such goods and the buyer had an opportunity of examining the goods but has not in fact examined the goods under section 16(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the seller is liable for
Where under a contract of sale, the property in the goods has passed to the buyer and the buyer wrongfully neglects or refuses to pay for the goods, the seller may:
To the buyer, in a suit for the refund of the price where there is a breach of contract of sale of goods on the part of the seller, under section 61 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the court can award interest to the buyer, from
Where the price of the goods under a contract of sale is to be fixed by the valuation of a third party who fails to fix the valuation, but goods are supplied to the buyer, under Section 10 of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the buyer is
In case of goods are sold by description by seller dealing in such goods and the buyer has in such actually examined the goods, under section 16(2) of the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the seller is responsible for
A milk seller and a fruit seller are two enemies, jealous from each other’s progress. One day the fruit seller found that the milk seller had mixed 20% water in the milk. Out of fear he replaced one litre of mixture with one litre of pure milk which was worth Rs. 80. Milk seller had 20 litre of mixture initially, but still after fruit seller’s work on his mixture, he was in profit. Find his profit percentage.