Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

P' gave her expensive dress to 'D', a dry cleaner for getting it cleaned, who in tum gave the dress to his worker 'M' for the purpose of cleaning. 'M' without permission of 'V' gave the dress to a lady 'X' for wearing on some party. 'X' returned the dress to 'M' in a damaged condition. 'P' files suit against 'D' for her loss.

P' gave her expensive dress to 'D', a dry cleaner for getting it cleaned, who in tum gave the dress to his worker 'M' for the purpose of cleaning. 'M' without permission of 'V' gave the dress to a lady 'X' for wearing on some party. 'X' returned the dress to 'M' in a damaged condition. 'P' files suit against 'D' for her loss. Correct Answer 'D' is vicariously liable since 'M' is 'D's employee and the dress was entrusted to 'M' by 'D'

Related Questions

X hands over her expensive saree for cleaning to a dry cleaner who loses the same. X claims the total value of the saree. The dry cleaner refers to a clause printed in the contract receipt which states that the dry cleaner can be held liable for Rs. 50 or 10% of the original value of the cloth only, whichever is less. Which one of the following propositions holds good to explain the correct position of law on the point?
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
Four couples go to a party. All the women are wearing different colour sarees. All men are wearing different coloured shirts. The colour of a shirt and a saree can be the same. Consider all the statements given below and answer the questions. Statement: 1. Rama is married to Ramesh who is wearing a red shirt. 2. Purva, who is not Anup's wife, is wearing a blue sari. 3. Anup and Shreya are wearing green clothes. 4. Sandesh's wife Mrunmayi has not worn a yellow sari. 5. Viraj is wearing a yellow shirt. Question: Who is Shreya's husband?
Five dresses are kept in a boutique having different price tags. Dress A is the second most expensive dress. Dress E is costlier than only one dress. Neither dress B nor dress D is the cheapest. Dress B is costlier than dress D. Which dress is the cheapest?
There are five persons sitting on a bench. Blue eyed lady sitting in the middle is my mother. At the extreme left, the man with grey hair is my maternal uncle. Lady sitting at the extreme right is having a pimple on her nose and is the wife of person who is sitting between blue eyed lady and grey haired man and has a pointed nose. A lady having marks on her face is the younger sister of the blue eyed lady and sitting on the remaining fifth place. The person having a pointed nose is the son of the blue eyed lady. What is the lady having marks on her face to the man sitting at extreme left ?
Principle: A plaintiff who suffers some injury will be entitled to receive compensation even if he suffers no loss.
Factual Situation: Reddy was a strong political worker of Party X. He was proceeding to the poling booth at about 7:30 am, to cast his vote in favour of Mr. Naik, his party candidate. On the way, the State Police officials suspected Reddy to be an anti-social element and took him into custody for questioning. Reddy pleaded with the officials that he was a genuine voter and had no previous criminal records and requested them to allow him to cast his vote. The officials allegedly detained him in custody till about 4:45 pm and thereafter released him, recording that they could not find any thing against him. By the time Reddy reached the poling booth the polling time was over and he could not vote for Mr. Naik. When the results were declared Mr. Naik got a Majority of over 6000 votes and Party X got the majority to form the Government. Reddy files a suit for compensation against the State.
A member of Parliament can be disqualified on the ground of dejection if
1. He leaves the party as a result of split in the party along with members who constitute only 1/3rd of the total membership of that party
2. A nominated member joins any political party after the expiry of 6 months from the date on which he takes his seat in the House
3. He gives up membership of the political party on whose ticket he is elected
4. He votes or abstains from voting in the House against the direction of political party without prior permission
Five delegates P, Q, R, S and T are forwarding their files to one another. P sends his file to Q, S and T, T sends his files to R while P and R exchange their files with each other. Q sends his file to S who sends his files to T. If P has to forward his files to R, then in how many ways P can forward files to R?
A' files a Suit for Mandatory Injunction against illegal disconnection of electricity. 'A' also suffers loss in the business on account of non supply of electricity. The suit for Mandatory Injunction is dismissed. 'A' thereafter files suit for damages for suffering loss. The subsequent Suit is barred
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?