Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Propositions as regards the liability of the surety under the surety bond are:
1. The liability of the surety is mutually exclusive of the liability of the accused under his personal bond.
2. The liability of the surety is contingent on the liability of the accused under his personal bond the liability of the surety.
3. is limited to the amount of the surety bond.
Now which of the following is correct
The joint liability in respect of joint tort-feasors arises in which one of the following circumstances?
1. Agency, when one person employs another to do an act which turns out to be a tort.
2. Vicarious liability, i.e., the liability arising from relations.
3. Joint action - where two or more persons combine together to commit an act which amounts to a tort.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Vicarious liability in case of independent contractor does not arise
Which of the following statement/statements is/are not correct?
1. Both Sections 34 and 149 of Indian Penal Code itself create specific offences
2. Both Sections 34 and 149 of Indian Penal Code relate to Doctrine of Vicarious liability
3. Section 34 fixes a minimum two persons who must share common intention while Section 149 requires there must be at least 10 persons to have the common object
4. Some active participation is necessary under Section 34 but Section 149 does not require it. Mere member of the unlawful Assembly with common object is sufficient for liability.
Match the items of List - II with the items of List - I and indicate the code of correct matching. The items relate to economies of scale/scope. List - I List - II (a) Economies of scale (i) arise with lower average costs of manufacturing a product when two complementary products are produced by a single firm (b) Internal economies ii) Mean lowering of costs of production by producing in bulk c) External economies (iii) Arise when cost per unit depends on size of the firm (d) Economies of scope (iv) Arise when cost per unit depends on the size of the industry, not the firm  
In which of the following cases the Supreme Court held that the provisions of Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 do not contain a condition that the prosecution of a company is sine qua non for prosecution of other persons. The liability of the Directors/Officers etc. is vicarious and will flow from the liability of the company/firm.
In a case of vicarious liability, the liability is
Under the vicarious liability, the liability is
"In the modern sense, the distinction between sovereign or non-sovereign power does not exist." In which case this statement was made in relation to 'Vicarious liability of the State'?
When the liability of a person who is one of the parties to the suit depends upon the liability of a stranger to the suit, then an admission by the stranger in respect of his liability shall be an admission on the part of that person who is a party to the suit. It has been so provided