Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the following situation:
The plaintiff, while passing through the public way near defendant's premises injured by fall of snow accumulated on the roof of the defendant's house as a result of severe storm, for which no warning had been given by the defendant to passer-by. It is a case of which one of the following?

Consider the following situation:
The plaintiff, while passing through the public way near defendant's premises injured by fall of snow accumulated on the roof of the defendant's house as a result of severe storm, for which no warning had been given by the defendant to passer-by. It is a case of which one of the following? Correct Answer Negligence only

Related Questions

The defendant did not remove the snow and ice accumulated on his roof as a result of severe snow storm and not warned the public of its presence. The plaintiff standing on the highway outside the defendant's premises is injured by fall of snow. The plaintiff claimed damages. Which one of the following statements is correct?
The defendant is:
A theft had been committed in the defendant's house. He informed the police that he suspected the plaintiff for the same. Therefore the plaintiff was arrested by the police. A complaint was filed by the defendant but the plaintiff was subsequently discharged by the magistrate as the final report showed that there was no evidence connecting the plaintiff with the theft. The plaintiff filed a suit for damages on the ground of malicious prosecution.
In the above case, which one of the following decisions is correct?
Plaintiff was the chairperson of the town meeting. The defendant having been very vociferous, a motion was made and carried out by majority that the defendant be turned out. The defendant said he would rather pull out the plaintiff than he turned out. He advanced menacingly towards the plaintiff with clinched fists, but his advance was prevented by a warden. Decide appropriate civil action against the defendant for his action against the plaintiff.
Z digs the mud road in front of his house. In the evening after it became dark a passerby hits the debris and is injured. The passerby brings a civil suit as well as files a criminal case of public nuisance. He can
Which of the following requirements form an essential element of the tort of malicious prosecution?
1. Prosecution of the plaintiff by the defendant
2. Termination of the case in favour of the defendant
3. Termination of the case in favour of the plaintiff
4. Presence of reasonable and probable cause
5. Absence of reasonable and probable cause
6. Malice on the part of the defendant
7. Damage suffered by the plaintiff
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Nirav's house is 40 m south of Akash's house. Daksh's house is to the east of Akash's house in a straight line at a distance of X m. Prakash's house if to the west of Akash's house in a straight line at a distance of Y m. If the shortest distance between Prakash's house and Nirav's house is 50 m and the shortest distance between Daksh's house and Nirav's house is also 50 m, then what is the distance between Prakash's house and Daksh's house? 
Which of the following will pose difficulties in adopting U.H.G. principles and processes in evaluating flood hydrographs of basins? 1. non-uniform real distribution within a storm 2. Intensity variation within a storm 3. The centre of the storm varies from storm to storm in case of large catchments 4. Dividing into a number of sub-basins and routing the individual DRHs through their respective channels to obtain the composite DRH at the basin outlet 5. Large storages within the catchment
The defendants, employees of the Municipal Corporation opened a main hole in the street and in the evening left the mainhole open and covered it by a canvas shelter, unattended and surrounded by warning lamps. The plaintiff, an eight year old boy, took one of the lamps into the shelter and was playing with it there,when he stumbled over it and it fell into the mainhole. A violent explosion followed and the plaintiff sustained bum injuries. The defendants are:
The window panels of a building belonging to the defendant, which was by the side of a highway, had been broken one Friday in an air-raid. The plaintiff was injured by a glass falling from the window the next Thursday by which time no repairs had been got done by the defendant. In this case, which one of the following is correct?
In the following question below three statements are given followed by three conclusions. Taking the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts, read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows the given statements. Statements: Each floor is roof. No roof is house. Some home are house. Conclusions: I. Some home are roof. II. No floor is house. III. Some roof are floor.