Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Assertion (A): The liability for negligence is based upon a general public sentiment of moral wrong doing for which the offender must pay.
Reason (R): On breach of duty towards the plaintiff to take care that results in damage, the plaintiff can sue for damages for negligence.

Assertion (A): The liability for negligence is based upon a general public sentiment of moral wrong doing for which the offender must pay.
Reason (R): On breach of duty towards the plaintiff to take care that results in damage, the plaintiff can sue for damages for negligence. Correct Answer A is false but R is true

Related Questions

Consider the following statements:
1. Tortious liability arise from breach of a duty primarily fixed by the law.
2. This duty is towards persons generally.
3. Breach of this duty is repressive by an action for unliquidated damages.
4. The quantum of damages is determined by the court.
Which of the above statements are correct?
Principle: Negligence as a tort is the breach of a legal duty to take care which resulted in damage, undesired by the defendant, to the plaintiff.
Facts: Plaintiff slipped into a pit filled with rain water. While slipping he caught hold of a nearby electricity pole to avert the fall. Due to leakage of electricity in the pole, he was electrocuted. Can the Electricity Board be held liable?
Consider the following statements:
(1) In case of breach of contract generally damages are awarded.
(2) In case of breach of contract, remedy of specific performance of contract is always given.
(3) In case of breach of contract, fine is also imposed along with the award of damages.
(4) In exceptional cases where damages are not adequate compensation, remedy of specific performance can be given.
Which of the statements given above are correct?
Owing to the negligence of the defendant railway company, the plaintiff and his family were made to get down at the wrong railway station. No accommodation was provided. As a result, the plaintiff's wife caught cold. The plaintiff claimed damages for consequential loss on account of medical expenses incurred for her treatment and her loss due to pay-cut in office. The claim for damages will not succeed on ground of:
Assertion (A): Public and private nuisance are not in reality two species of the same genus at all. Obstruction of a highways is public nuisance but an individual can sue on proof of special damages to him.
Reason (R): Negligence is a necessary condition of a claim for nuisance and the latter is a breach of the former.
The plaintiff instructed his Banker to deposit excise duty on his behalf in the Govt. treasury and debit the current account of plaintiff. The Bank deposited the said sum in the treasury. Later the plaintiff came to know, that the said amount was embezzled by the Treasurer and the Accountant of the treasury and the amount was not credited in the name of the plaintiff. If the plaintiff brings an action against the State for damages then the State is:
The essential ingredient of the tort of negligence are
(1) When one owes a duty of care towards the other.
(2) When one commits a breach of that duty and
(3) The other person suffers damage as a consequence thereof
Choose correct response for below
Consider the following statements with regard to the consequences of breach of contract.
1. In case of breach of contract, the party who suffers is entitled to receive compensation for any loss or damage caused to him thereby, which the parties knew, when they made the contract, to be likely to result from the breach of it.
2. Such compensation is to be given for any remote and indirect loss or damage sustained by reason of the breach.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following statements are correct?
1. In tort, the duties are imposed by law whereas in contract, duties are undertaken by the parties themselves.
2. In tort, the duty is towards the world at large but in contract, the duty is towards specific individual or individuals.
3. In tort, damages are liquidated but in contract, the damages are unliquidated.
4. In tort, a person may be liable for the wrongs committed by others also but in contract, the liability governs the parties to the contract only.
Select the correct answer using the given below:
Principle: General rule is that it is for the plaintiff to prove negligence of the defendant. But if the thing causing the injury is under the control of defendant and injury is such as would not occur without negligence, law presumes negligence.
Facts: While performing a surgery for the removal of stones from the kidney of 'A', Dr. 'B' left a mop inside the body of 'A'. 'A' suffered acute pain and has to be operated again for the removal of the mop.
'A' sues Dr. 'B' for damages.