Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

As a result of the changes introduced by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughter of a coparcener in a Joint Hindu Family, governed by the Mitakshara Law, becomes a coparcener-

As a result of the changes introduced by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughter of a coparcener in a Joint Hindu Family, governed by the Mitakshara Law, becomes a coparcener- Correct Answer w.e.f 9<sup>th</sup> September, 2005

Related Questions

After the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005, the daughter of a coparcener in a Joint Hindu family governed by the Mitakshara law:
Give the correct Response
1. The interest of a coparcener in the joint family property becomes fixed only by partition.
2. A coparcener has an interest by birth in the joint family property.
3. The interest that a coparcener acquires at birth is undetermined interest.
4. The interest which a coparcener acquires in the joint family property is unpredictable as well as fluctuating.
With reference to the history of ancient India, which of the following statements is/are correct? 1. Mitakshara was the civil law for upper castes and Dayabhaga was the civil law for lower castes. 2. In the Mitakshara system, the sons can claim right to the property during the lifetime of the father, whereas in the Dayabhaga system, it is only after the death of the father that the sons can claim right to the property. 3. The Mitakshara system deals with the matters related to the property held by male members only of a family, whereas the Dayabhaga system deals with the matters related to ‘the property held by both male and female members of a family. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Which of the following persons will come under Marumakkattayam law as per Section 3 of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
1. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Ezhava Act of 1100
2. Those who would have been governed by The Cochin Nayar Act of 1113
3. Those who would have been governed by The Cochin Nambudri Act, 1113
Which of the followings will come under Nambudri law as per section 3 of The Hindu Succession Act, 1956?
1. Those who would have been governed by The Madras Nambudri Act, 1932
2. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Kshatriya Act of 1108
3. Those who would have been governed by The Travancore Malaya Brahmin Act of 1106
In the presence of any of the female relatives or a male relative claiming through a female, the interest of a coparcener in the joint Hindu family governed by Mitakshara school, shall devolve by
The male Hindu dies after the commencement of Hindu Succession Act. (But before the Hindu Succession Amendment Act. 2005) He was having interest in Mitakshra Coparcenery property at the time of his death:
Hindu Succession Act- 'A' the only son of the 'B' and coparcener in a Joint Hindu Family governing by Mitakshra Law, murders "B", who died intestate. Who will succeed to the property of B?
Given below are two statements
Statement I: Two Hindus married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in matters of inheritance.
Statement II: Two Muslims married under the Special Marriage Act, 1954 are governed by the Indian Succession Act, 1925 in matters of inheritance.
In light of the above statements, choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below
The Hindu Succession Act as amended in September, 2005 empowered the daughter of a coparcener rights in coparcenary property like son under . . . . . . . . of the Act.