Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The male Hindu dies after the commencement of Hindu Succession Act. (But before the Hindu Succession Amendment Act. 2005) He was having interest in Mitakshra Coparcenery property at the time of his death:

The male Hindu dies after the commencement of Hindu Succession Act. (But before the Hindu Succession Amendment Act. 2005) He was having interest in Mitakshra Coparcenery property at the time of his death: Correct Answer His interest in the property shall devolve by survivorship, upon the surviving members of the coparcenery

Related Questions

Captain Jack Sparrow, on his death bed, keeps half his property for this wife and divides the rest equally among his three sons: Barbossa, Will Turner and Dave. Some years later, Barbossa dies leaving half his property to his widow and half to his brothers Will Turner and Dave together, sharing equally. When Will Turner makes his will, he keeps half his property for his widow and the rest he bequeaths to his younger brother Dave. When Dave dies some years later, he keeps half his property for his widow and the remaining for his mother. The mother now has Rs. 1,575,000.What was the worth of the total property?
Anjum is counting his last days, he keeps half his property for his wife and divides the rest equally among his three sons: Bimar, Cumar and Danger. Some years later, Bimar dies, leaving half his property to his widow and half to his brothers, Cumar and Danger together, sharing equally. When Cumar makes his will, he keeps half his property for his widow and the rest he bequeaths to his younger brother Danger. When Danger dies some years later, he keeps half his property for his widow and the remaining for his mother. The mother now has Rs. 1575000. What was the worth of the total property?
According to Mr. Sharma’s will, half of his property goes to his wife and the rest is equally divided between his two sons, Ravi and Raj. Some years later, Ravi dies and leaves half of his property to his widow and rest to his brother Raj. When Raj dies, he leaves half of his property to his widow and remaining to his mother, who is still alive. The mother now owns 88,000 worth of the property. The total worth of the property of Mr. Sharma was
Priya and khushi invested Rs.3000 together. Priya invested her amount at compound interest for ‘x/10’ years at x% rate interest and khushi invested half of her amount at compound interest and remaining half at simple interest at the same rate of interest for the same time period. [It is given that ‘x/10’ is a natural number] What is the value of ‘x’? Statement I: Ratio of investment of priya and khushi is 1 : 2 respectively and total sum received by them together after a particular time at x% rate of interest is Rs. 4280. Statement II: Simple interest received by khushi is Rs. 40 less than compound interest received by her. Statement III: Sum of simple interest and compound interest received by khushi after a certain time at x% rate of interest is Rs. 2500 Which of the above statement is redundant to find the answer of the given question?
Given below are three quantities named 1, 2 and 3. Based on the given information, you have to determine the relationship between the three quantities. You should use the given data and knowledge of Mathematics to choose between the possible answer. Quantity 1: An automobile financier claims to be lending money at simple interest, but he includes the interest every six months for calculating the principal. If he is charging an interest of 10%, the effective rate of interest becomes. Quantity 2: A sum of Rs. 725 is lent at the beginning of a year at a certain rate of interest. After 8 months, a sum of Rs. 362.50 more is lent but at the rate twice the former. At the end of the year, Rs. 33.50 is earned as interest from both the loans. What was the original rate of interest? Quantity 3: The difference between the compound interest and the simple interest on an amount of 15000 for 2 years is Rs. 96. What is the rate of interest per annum?
A dies after the commencement of the Hindu Succession Act leaving behind three sons B, C and D. The interest in the property passes to by :
Hindu Succession Act- A Hindu widow X got property in succession from her mother. X dies intestate. She leaves after her a brother and her husband's father and mother. Her property would devolved upon
Hindu Succession Act- 'A' the only son of the 'B' and coparcener in a Joint Hindu Family governing by Mitakshra Law, murders "B", who died intestate. Who will succeed to the property of B?
Seven people A, B, C, D, E, F and G live on separate floors of a 7-floor building. Ground floor is numbered 1, first floor is numbered. 2 and so on until the topmost floor is numbered 7. Each one of these having a different cars-Cadillac, Ambassador, Fiat, Maruti, Mercedes, Bedford and Fargo but not necessarily in the same order. Only three people live above the floor on which A lives. Only one person lives between A and the one having a car Cadillac. F lives immediately below the one having a car Bedford. The one having a car Bedford lives on an even-numbered floor. Only three people live between the ones having a car Cadillac and Maruti. E lives immediately above C. E is not having a car Maruti. Only two people live between B and the one having a car Fargo. The one having a car Fargo lives below the floor on which B lives. The one having a car Fiat does not live immediately above D or immediately below B. D does not live immediately above or immediately below A. G does not have a car Ambassador. Question : How many people live between the floors on which D and the one having a car Bedford ?
Property inherited by a Hindu male under section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 on the death of said Hindu, the devolution of such property shall be governed by