Give correct responseA sale of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity.

Give correct response
Which of the following sales of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity:

A

Payments of rent or Government revenue and debts binding on the family

B

A house of the joint family is sold to meet the expenses of appeal to defend one of the coparceners, convicted by the lower court, of a raping a minor girl and then killing her

C

Karta sold the dwelling house to meet the expenses of higher education of his second son. Karta, himself and his first sons are employed as peons in a Government Office

D

Sale of a part of joint family property to meet the expenses of the re-marriage of a widowed daughter

A', on 9^th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9^th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31^st January, 2016, on 1^st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17^th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is:

A

With effect from 9^th January, 2015

B

With effect from 9^th July, 2015

C

With effect from 17^th February, 2016

D

With effect from 1^st February, 2016

Give correct response
An alienation made by the karta without legal necessity but with the consent of all other adult coparceners is:

A

Invalid

B

Void

C

Valid

D

Voidable

Ramesh, karta of a joint property sold different properties to different persons on different dates. After the death of Ramesh, Suresh filed a suit joining all the purchasers as defendants and claimed that Ramesh transferred the properties when there was no legal necessity to do so. Purchasers claimed misjoinder of cause of action. Decide whether there is a misjoinder of cause of action.

A

Yes, there is a misjoinder of cause of action

B

No, there is no misjoinder

C

Facts are not sufficient to decide

D

None of the above

Give the correct Response
1. The interest of a coparcener in the joint family property becomes fixed only by partition.
2. A coparcener has an interest by birth in the joint family property.
3. The interest that a coparcener acquires at birth is undetermined interest.
4. The interest which a coparcener acquires in the joint family property is unpredictable as well as fluctuating.

A

1, 3 and 4

B

1, 2 and 4

C

1 and 3

D

1, 2, 3 and 4

Give correct response
The alienation by Karta will not be considered as for the purpose of legal necessity?

A

Selling of the property for marriage of grand daughter

B

Selling of the property to discharge the debts of a close family friend

C

Selling of the property to purchase business machinery

D

Selling of an old house as he had insufficient income to support several family members

Where the manager of a joint Hindu family alienates joint family property, the burden of proof of necessity ties

A

On the alienor

B

On the alienee

C

On the alienor and the alienee both

D

Either on the alienor or the alienee depending on the facts or circumstances of the case

Alienation by the Karta without legal necessity or benefit of estate or in discharge of indispensable duty is :

A

Valid

B

Voidable

C

Void

D

None of the above

Under Hindu Law, a Karta of the joint family can alienate the property

A

Only for legal necessity

B

Only for benefit of estate

C

For both legal necessity and benefit of estate

D

Only after obtaining permission from the court

Give correct response
A Karta can alienate the joint family property for:

A

Kutumbarthe

B

Apatkale

C

Dharamarthe

D

All of the above

Give correct response
A sale of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity.

Related Questions