Give correct response
Which of the following sales of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity:

Give correct response
Which of the following sales of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity: Correct Answer Karta sold the dwelling house to meet the expenses of higher education of his second son. Karta, himself and his first sons are employed as peons in a Government Office

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Give correct response
A sale of the joint family property made by the Karta of the Hindu Joint family could not be said for the legal necessity.
Give correct response
An alienation made by the karta without legal necessity but with the consent of all other adult coparceners is:
Ramesh, karta of a joint property sold different properties to different persons on different dates. After the death of Ramesh, Suresh filed a suit joining all the purchasers as defendants and claimed that Ramesh transferred the properties when there was no legal necessity to do so. Purchasers claimed misjoinder of cause of action. Decide whether there is a misjoinder of cause of action.
A certain company that sells only cars and trucks reported that revenues from car sales in 1997 were down 11 percent from 1996 and revenues from truck sales in 1997 were up 7 percent from 1996. If total revenues from car sales and truck sales in 1997 were up 1 percent from 1996, what is the ratio of revenue from car sales in 1996 to revenue from truck sales in 1996?
Give the correct Response
1. The interest of a coparcener in the joint family property becomes fixed only by partition.
2. A coparcener has an interest by birth in the joint family property.
3. The interest that a coparcener acquires at birth is undetermined interest.
4. The interest which a coparcener acquires in the joint family property is unpredictable as well as fluctuating.
Give correct response
The alienation by Karta will not be considered as for the purpose of legal necessity?
Where the manager of a joint Hindu family alienates joint family property, the burden of proof of necessity ties
"BDL Ltd. is currently preparing its cash budget for the year to 31 March 20XX. An extract from its sales budget for the same year shows the following sales values.
Rs
March 60,000
April 70,000
May 55,000
June 65,000
40% of its sales are expected to be for cash. Of its credit sales, 70% are expected to pay in month after sale and take a 2% discount. 27% are expected to pay in the second month after the sale, and the remaining 3% are expected to be bad debts. The value of sales budget to be shown in the cash budget for May 20XX is"
Alienation by the Karta without legal necessity or benefit of estate or in discharge of indispensable duty is :
Under Hindu Law, a Karta of the joint family can alienate the property