Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In case of mistake, under section 17, Limitation Act, 1963, the limitation shall start running from

In case of mistake, under section 17, Limitation Act, 1963, the limitation shall start running from Correct Answer The date when the mistake with due diligence could have been discovered

Related Questions

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.
Dhanu, Fani, Ganu and Tinu were playing cricket. One of them threw the ball on window by mistake and glass was broken. They all know who has done this and each one makes a statement about this. Select the person who has done the mistake if only one of them is making true statement. Dhanu : I didn't make the mistake and Ganu also didn't break it. Fani : I didn't make the mistake and Dhanu also didn't break it. Ganu : I didn't make the mistake and Fani also didn't break it. Tinu : I didn't make the mistake and Dhanu also didn't break it.
Where in any case, the suit or application is based upon fraud or mistake, the period of limitation shall not begin to run unit the plaintiff or applicant has discovered the fraud or the mistake. The statement is:
(1) False
(2) True
(3) Provided under Section 17
(4) Not provided under Limitation Act
Choose the correct combination:
In which of the following case, the court has held that limitation period as provided in the Limitation Act, 1963 would extend seven years by virtue of Section 39 of the Limitation Act, since a period of 30 years. Thus making Limitation period for redemption of Mortgage as 37 years
A group of 74 students of Class XI went on picnic. The number of students who went on picnic by each section is as follows: Section A = 15 Section B = 24 Section C = 15 Section D = 20 5 students from Section A spent as much as 4 students from Section B. 12 Section B students spent as much as 9 Section C students and 6 Section C students spent as much as 8 Section D student. If every student of a particular section spent the same amount and all the students spent Rs. 23,370 altogether, find the amount spent by each student of Section D?
Consider the following statements:
Consent obtained by mistake renders an agreement void if it is:
1. regarding value of the subject matter of the contract.
2. a mistake of fact by both the parties to the contract.
3. a mistake of law in force in India.
4. a mistake of foreign law by one party to the contract.
Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Under Section 26 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 for rectification of instruments on the ground of fraud or mutual mistake, the time limit for discovery of fraud or mutual mistake is:
Which of the following statements are true/false?
1. In case an employee whose minimum rate of wages is fixed under this Act, works overtime, the employer need not pay the money for the extra hours devoted by the employee.
2. If an employee whose minimum rate of wages has been fixed under this Act, works for a less number of hours than the requisite number of hours on a given day, he shall be entitled to receive wages in respect ofwork done by him on that day as ifhe had worked for a full normal working day.
3. In case an employee is involved in two or more classes of work, he shall be paid on the basis of pieces involved.
4. If an employee is employed on piece work for which minimum time rate and not a minimum piece rate has been fixed under this Act, the employer shall pay to such employee wages at not less than the minimum time rate.
In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held that "Though Limitation of 1 year as provided in Contempt of Courts Act, in fit case provisions of section 5 and 17 of Limitation Act can be applied by virtue of section 29(2)of Limitation Act"?
Last year, there were three sections in a competitive exam. Out of them 33 students cleared the cut-off in Section A, 34 students cleared the cut-off in Section B and 32 students cleared the cut-off in Section C. 10 students cleared the cut-off in section A and section B, 9 cleared the cut-off in section B and section C and 8 cleared the cut-off in section A and section C. The number of students who cleared only one section was equal and was 21 for each section. How many students cleared all the three sections?