Section 13 of the Limitation Act, 1963 applies in case of:

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

In which of the following case, the court has held that limitation period as provided in the Limitation Act, 1963 would extend seven years by virtue of Section 39 of the Limitation Act, since a period of 30 years. Thus making Limitation period for redemption of Mortgage as 37 years

A

Santa Singh v. Prakash Singh

B

Purshottam v. Sagaji

C

M. P. Ahmad v. Kutheravattam Estate Receiver

D

All the above cases

A group of 74 students of Class XI went on picnic. The number of students who went on picnic by each section is as follows: Section A = 15 Section B = 24 Section C = 15 Section D = 20 5 students from Section A spent as much as 4 students from Section B. 12 Section B students spent as much as 9 Section C students and 6 Section C students spent as much as 8 Section D student. If every student of a particular section spent the same amount and all the students spent Rs. 23,370 altogether, find the amount spent by each student of Section D?

A

Rs. 307.50

B

Rs. 410

C

Rs. 246.50

D

Rs. 369

In which of the following cases the Calcutta High Court held that "Though Limitation of 1 year as provided in Contempt of Courts Act, in fit case provisions of section 5 and 17 of Limitation Act can be applied by virtue of section 29(2)of Limitation Act"?

A

Subrata Kundu v. Kshiti Gostoami, AIR 2010 Cal 44

B

Nirpendra Ch. Dey v. Collector, AIR 2010 Cal 49

C

Aruna Ghosh v. Vimla, AIR 2010 Cal 62

D

Vikashini Ghosh v. A. K. Roy, AIR 2010 Cal 1

Last year, there were three sections in a competitive exam. Out of them 33 students cleared the cut-off in Section A, 34 students cleared the cut-off in Section B and 32 students cleared the cut-off in Section C. 10 students cleared the cut-off in section A and section B, 9 cleared the cut-off in section B and section C and 8 cleared the cut-off in section A and section C. The number of students who cleared only one section was equal and was 21 for each section. How many students cleared all the three sections?

A

6

B

9

C

8

D

7

Under limitation Act, any suit for which no period of limitation is provided elsewhere in schedule of the limitation Act, the limitation would be

A

One year

B

Three years

C

Three months

D

Twelve years

Section 4, Limitation Act, 1963 applies where the case is governed by

A

The Limitation Act, 1963

B

Any local law

C

Any special law

D

Either (A) or (B) or (C)

What will be the limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?

A

1 year

B

2 years

C

3 years

D

No limitation

If any period of limitation, is to be excluded from the prescribed period of limitation, the party necessary has to satisfy and of appropriate provisions in Sections . . . . . . . . to . . . . . . . . of the Limitation Act, 1963.

A

4 to 24

B

25 to 27

C

28 to 32

D

None of the above

What will be limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?

A