Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.
The period of limitation to set aside a sale in execution of a decree under Article 127 of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963, from the date of the sale is:
Which of the following statements is correct?
An attachment order may come to an end by
A. Satisfaction of decree.
B. Setting aside or reversal of decree.
C. Dismissal of execution application for decree holder's default.
D. Death of the decree holder.
E. Agreement/compromise between the parties.
Select the correct answer:
Which of the following reasons led to the setting aside of the practice of 'talaqe- biddat', triple talaq in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, (2017) 9 SCC 1?
(1) Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 was a pre-constitutional legislation within the meaning of Article 13(1) and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India on the ground of arbitrariness.
(2) Section 2 of the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 was a pre-constitutional legislation within the meaning of Article 13(1) and violative of Article 15 of the Constitution of India, being discriminatory.
(3) Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937 is not a law regulating triple talaq but the practice of triple talaq was against the basic tenets of the Holy Quran and no practice against the tenets of Quran was permissible.
(4) 'Talaq-e-biddat' is integral to the religious denomination but the Supreme Court may injunct this practice as a means for severing matrimonial relationship.
An ex parte decree passed by Court 'A' was transferred to Court 'B' for execution and which execution proceedings are pending in Court 'B'. Court 'A' aside the ex parte decree and on re-hearing, a fresh decree was passed on the same terms.
Under the Limitation Act, the period of limitation for filing an application for an order to set aside an abatement is:
Under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation prescribed for setting aside exparte decree is
An electronics shop was selling articles at a high discount. Kajal went to buy 3 articles from the shop. The cost of the first article is 33.33% less than the cost of the 2nd article. The cost of the 3rd article is 300% more than the discount on the 2nd article. The discount on the 1st article is 30% less than the discount on the 3rd article. After the discounts, Kajal receives an additional discount, which is equal to the sum of discounts on the first 2 articles. The discount on the 1st article is 80.55% less than the price of the 3rd article. Which of the following is true if the cost of article 1 is 50% less than the cost of article 3?
Sub-sections (2) to (4) of the present Section 12, Limitation Act, 1963 refers specifically to which of the following types of proceedings?
1. Appeal
2. Application to leave to appeal
3. Application to revision
4. Application to review
5. Application to set aside an award
A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is: