Under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation prescribed for setting aside exparte decree is

Assertion (A): Where any special or local law prescribes for any suit appeal or application a period of limitation different from period prescribed by the Schedule, the provisions of Section 3 of Limitation Act, 1963 shall apply as if such period were the period prescribed by the schedule.
Reason (R): Where a Special Law prescribes a period of limitation for filing appeal but there is no provision therefore under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation provided under the Special Law must be treated to be different from that under the Limitation Act.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

Assertion (A): Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963 empowers the Court to admit a suit after the prescribed period if the plaintiff satisfies the Court that he had sufficient cause for not instituting the suit.
Reason (R): Even an appeal may be admitted after the prescribed period if the appellant shows sufficient cause for not preferring the appeal within the prescribed period.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true but (R) is false

D

(A) is false but (R) is true

Which of the following statements is correct?
An attachment order may come to an end by
A. Satisfaction of decree.
B. Setting aside or reversal of decree.
C. Dismissal of execution application for decree holder's default.
D. Death of the decree holder.
E. Agreement/compromise between the parties.
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 2, 3 and 5

B

2, 3 and 5

C

2, 3, 4 and 5

D

All these

In which of the following case, the court has held that limitation period as provided in the Limitation Act, 1963 would extend seven years by virtue of Section 39 of the Limitation Act, since a period of 30 years. Thus making Limitation period for redemption of Mortgage as 37 years

A

Santa Singh v. Prakash Singh

B

Purshottam v. Sagaji

C

M. P. Ahmad v. Kutheravattam Estate Receiver

D

All the above cases

The period of limitation to set aside a sale in execution of a decree under Article 127 of the Schedule of the Limitation Act, 1963, from the date of the sale is:

A

30 days

B

90 days

C

60 days

D

10 days

If any period of limitation, is to be excluded from the prescribed period of limitation, the party necessary has to satisfy and of appropriate provisions in Sections . . . . . . . . to . . . . . . . . of the Limitation Act, 1963.

A

4 to 24

B

25 to 27

C

28 to 32

D

None of the above

Under Article 127 of Limitation Act for filing of application to set aside a sale in execution of decree, limitation is prescribed

A

120 days from date of sale

B

90 days from date of sale

C

60 days from date of sale

D

30 days from date of sale

The period of three years is prescribed under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in case where no other period of Limitation is provided for filing any:

A

Suit

B

Appeal

C

Application

D

Proceeding

As per Section 19 of the Limitation Act, 1963 if any payment is made on account of a debt, before the expiration of the prescribed period by the person liable to pay the debt or by his agent duly authorized in that behalf a fresh period of limitation starts running from the

A

Time when suit was filed

B

When the payment was made

C

When the creditor demands

D

None of the above

What will be the limitation period for instituting a suit for which no specific period of limitation is provided under Limitation Act, 1963?

A

1 year

B

2 years

C

3 years

D

No limitation

Under Limitation Act, 1963, the period of limitation prescribed for setting aside exparte decree is

Related Questions