Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
In a suit for recovery of possession by a person dispossessed of possession of immovable property under the Specific Relief Act, which one is not the essential requirement of the suit?
A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is:
A suit for recovery of possession of any immovable property under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act can be filed against:
A person is dispossessed of his immovable property without due course of law. In what period can he bring a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963?
Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act a suit for recovery of possession of immovable property may be brought within . . . . . . . . from the date of dispossession
The suit for recovery of possession of an immovable property under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act can be filed against:
Where a suit plaint seeking relief of possession of an immovable property is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure, whether filing of a fresh suit is barred?
During continuance of possession of immovable property the person in possession is estopped from denying the title to such immovable property of the person who put him in such possession, if:
Limitation to file suit for recovery of specific immovable property under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act is . . . . . . . .