Where a suit plaint seeking relief of possession of an immovable property is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure, whether filing of a fresh suit is barred?

Where a suit plaint seeking relief of possession of an immovable property is rejected under Order VII Rule 11 Code of Civil Procedure, whether filing of a fresh suit is barred? Correct Answer No, filing of a suit is not barred provided the fresh suit is filed within the period of limitation

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Saroja was granted government land. She was dispossessed without her consent. She instituted suit against the government under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963, for recovering possession of the property. The court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(D) of CPC (Code of Civil Procedure). Whether rejection is proper?
On rejection of a suit under Order VII, Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure, a fresh suit on the same cause of action under Order VII, Rule 13 of Code of Civil Procedure
When a suit is dismissed under Order IX, Rule 2 or under Order IX, Rule 3 of Code of Civil Procedure, a fresh suit under Order IX, Rule 4 of Code of Civil Procedure, the same cause of action is
On rejection of plaint under provisions of Order VII Rule 11 of Civil Procedure, 1908, presenting of a fresh plaint in respect of the same cause of action, is:
After dismissal of suit under Order 9, Rule 8 of Code of Civil Procedure, a fresh suit on the same cause of action, under Order 9, Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure
Which of the following statements are correct in the context of Section 5 of Code of Civil Procedure?
1. Revenue Court is a part of Civil Court
2. Civil Court. means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure but not Revenue Court
3. Civil Court means courts having original jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure including Revenue Court
4. Revenue Court is not a part of Civil Court
Where a plaintiff fails to present the required copy/copies of the plaint alongwith the requisite fee within the prescribed period under Order VII, Rule 9 of Code of Civil Procedure from the date of the order of serving of summons on the defendant, the plaint is liable to be
A', on 9th January, 2015 agrees to sell his immovable property to 'R' and out of the total sale consideration of Rs. 3,00,000/- receives a sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- from 'B' as advance payment and agrees to vacate the property and handover vacant peaceful physical possession thereof to 'B' and to execute the Sale Deed of the property in favour of 'B' on receipt of balance sale 'consideration' on or before 9th July, 2015. 'A' fails to vacate the property or to execute the Sale Deed or to deliver possession of the property to 'B'. 'B' after waiting patiently till 31st January, 2016, on 1st February, 2016 got issued a legal notice to 'A' to take the balance sale consideration and execute the Sale Deed and deliver vacant peaceful physical possession. 'A' vide his reply received by 'B' on 17th February, 2016 denies the agreement. The limitation of three years available to 'B' for instituting a suit for specific performance is:
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Temporary ⇔ Order 39 Code of Civil Procedure injunction
2. Suit by Indigent ⇔ Order 33 Code of Civil Procedure person
3. Powers of Appellate ⇔ Section 102 Code of Civil Procedure Hate Court
4. Right to file ⇔ Section 148A Code of Civil Procedure caveat
Select correct answer:
A sues B to recover one of two properties left by C, on the ground that he and not B is his heir. Thereafter, he applies to amend his plaint for including the second property left out in the plaint as originally field. B opposes the application for amendment which is disallowed by the court. A suit by A against B to recover the second property as heir of C would be barred under rule 2: