Who cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from a person having sufficient means, who neglects or refuses to maintain him/her:

Who cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from a person having sufficient means, who neglects or refuses to maintain him/her: Correct Answer Brother unable to maintain himself

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Point out wrong answer:
An order maintenance may be passed under section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code where a person neglects or refuses to maintain:
Statement A: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has same incidents as bail granted under Chapter XXXIII of the Code.
Statement B: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be cancelled under Section 437(5) of the Code.
Which of the following persons is not entitled to maintenance under Section 125, Criminal Procedure Code from a man who has sufficient means and refuses to maintain them?
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure
Code is a wider and more general Section than Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code is discretionary; whereas Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory.
Which one of the statements given above is/are correct?
Find out the correct matches:
1. Section 228 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Framing of Charge
2. Section 227 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Discharge
3. Section 232 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Acquittal
4. Section 236 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Previous Acquittal
Which one of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory bail ⇔ Section 437 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
2. Summary dismissal ⇔ Section 384 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
3. Appeal in case of ⇔ Section 376 of Criminal Procedure Code acquittal Code
4. Reference to ⇔ Section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code High Court Code
Select correct answer:
Which one of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory Bail ⇔ Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code
2. Summary Dismissal of Appeal ⇔ Section 384, Criminal Procedure Code
3. Reference to High Court ⇔ Section 394, Criminal Procedure Code
4. Compounding of Offences ⇔ Section 320, Criminal Procedure Code
Mark the incorrect proposition:
1. Set-off is a statutory defence to a plaintiff's action, whereas a counterclaim is a cross-action.
2. Set-off and counter-claim arises out of the same transaction.
3. Set-off should not be barred on the date of the suit while counter-claim should not be barred on the date of filing of written statement.
4. Claim for set-off cannot exceed plaintiff's claim, whereas counterclaim can exceed the plaintiffs claim.
5. Both set-off and counter-claim cannot exceed the pecuniary jurisdiction of the court.
In which case it was held that second wife of a person, whose husband's first wife is alive cannot claim maintenance from her husband under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code 1973?
A minor child claims maintenance under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from his father who is in U. S. A. The Court directed the Magistrate to issue warrant for recovery of amount of maintenance from concerned parents in U. S. A. through Indian Ambassador in U. S. A. It was also held by the Court that if father fails to send the amount of maintenance, then the Magistrate will proceed according to law. This was held in: