Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A minor child claims maintenance under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from his father who is in U. S. A. The Court directed the Magistrate to issue warrant for recovery of amount of maintenance from concerned parents in U. S. A. through Indian Ambassador in U. S. A. It was also held by the Court that if father fails to send the amount of maintenance, then the Magistrate will proceed according to law. This was held in:

A minor child claims maintenance under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from his father who is in U. S. A. The Court directed the Magistrate to issue warrant for recovery of amount of maintenance from concerned parents in U. S. A. through Indian Ambassador in U. S. A. It was also held by the Court that if father fails to send the amount of maintenance, then the Magistrate will proceed according to law. This was held in: Correct Answer Piyal v. Pradeep Kumar Kamboj, 2000

Related Questions

Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Section 93(3) of Criminal Procedure Code provides that no Magistrate other than a District Magistrate or Chief Judicial Magistrate shall issue warrant of search for a document, parcel or other thing in the custody of postal and telegraph authority. If any Magistrate not so specified issues such a warrant
Under Section 95 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, certain publications can be forfeited and search warrant can be issued for the same. In this context, which of the following is/are the correct legal proposition?
1. A news paper cannot be forfeited and search warrant cannot be issued for the same as it would be violative of the fundamental right of speech and expression
2. A book can be forfeited and search warrant can be issued for the same
3. A document can be forfeited and search warrant can be issued for the same
Select the correct answer:
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Statement A: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has same incidents as bail granted under Chapter XXXIII of the Code.
Statement B: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be cancelled under Section 437(5) of the Code.
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure
Code is a wider and more general Section than Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code is discretionary; whereas Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory.
Which one of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which one of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory bail ⇔ Section 437 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
2. Summary dismissal ⇔ Section 384 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
3. Appeal in case of ⇔ Section 376 of Criminal Procedure Code acquittal Code
4. Reference to ⇔ Section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code High Court Code
Select correct answer:
Which one of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory Bail ⇔ Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code
2. Summary Dismissal of Appeal ⇔ Section 384, Criminal Procedure Code
3. Reference to High Court ⇔ Section 394, Criminal Procedure Code
4. Compounding of Offences ⇔ Section 320, Criminal Procedure Code
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition