In which case it was held that second wife of a person, whose husband's first wife is alive cannot claim maintenance from her husband under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code 1973?

W, a married woman lived with her husband, along with a six month old baby, but her life was miserable as her husband frequently used to beat her. She wanted to go to her pursued but her husband threatened to beat her if she dares to do so. But one day when W was missing the husband perused her and found that she was going to her parents with the baby. When W turned around and found her husband running towards her, panic stricken she along with the baby jumped into a well. The baby died but she survived. She was prosecuted for the death of the baby. What offence if any has been committed by her?

A

Murder

B

No offence

C

Death by accident

D

Culpable homicide not amounting to murder

A husband was directed to pay maintenance to his wife and his minor son under section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. Subsequently the matter was settled outside Court on a lump-sum payment made by husband to the wife. Approximately after nine years of the agreement, the wife moved an application for the enforcement of the maintenance order. Which of the following statements will apply to the case?

A

The long delay of nine years will cause the application to be rejected

B

Mutual settlement outside the Court has rendered the order as void, as such the application will be rejected

C

The wife has wavered her right to maintenance and as such the application will be rejected

D

The waiver in derogation of a statutory right cannot be recognised by the Court, as such the application will be accepted

Statement A: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has same incidents as bail granted under Chapter XXXIII of the Code.
Statement B: Bail granted under Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 cannot be cancelled under Section 437(5) of the Code.

A

Statement A is correct

B

Statement B is correct

C

Both the statements are correct

D

Both the statements are incorrect

A minor child claims maintenance under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from his father who is in U. S. A. The Court directed the Magistrate to issue warrant for recovery of amount of maintenance from concerned parents in U. S. A. through Indian Ambassador in U. S. A. It was also held by the Court that if father fails to send the amount of maintenance, then the Magistrate will proceed according to law. This was held in:

A

Piyal v. Pradeep Kumar Kamboj, 2000

B

Sargam Bonia Sreenu v. Kamal, 2000

C

Din Dayal v. Arun Kumar, 2000

D

Ashok Kumar v. Kirpal Singh, 2000

Which one of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory bail ⇔ Section 437 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
2. Summary dismissal ⇔ Section 384 of Criminal Procedure Codeode
3. Appeal in case of ⇔ Section 376 of Criminal Procedure Code acquittal Code
4. Reference to ⇔ Section 397 of Criminal Procedure Code High Court Code
Select correct answer:

A

1, 2 and 4

B

1, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 3

D

2, 3 and 4

Consider the following statements:
1. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure
Code is a wider and more general Section than Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code.
2. Section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code is discretionary; whereas Section 145 of Criminal Procedure Code is mandatory.
Which one of the statements given above is/are correct?

A

1 only

B

2 only

C

Both 1 and 2

D

Neither 1 nor 2

A (a 25 year old man) was B's (a 23 year old woman) neighbour. He fell in love with her and wanted to ask her to enter into a relationship with him. He sent her a number of text messages proclaiming his love for her. She did not respond to his overtures. On November 18, 2013, A went to B's house and told her that he was in love with her, and wanted to marry her. She told him that she was not interested and asked him to leave. A believed that B was only playing hard to get, and if he persisted, she would change her mind. On November 25, 2013, when B was returning home from her workplace, A met her again and proclaimed his love for her again. She again told him that she was not interested, and threatened to complain to the police. In spite of this, a week later, when B was leaving for work, she noticed that A was waiting outside her house, with a bouquet of flowers, and he tried to give her the flowers. B ignored him once again, and went to the police station to complain about A's acts. Under what Section of the Indian Penal Code should the police register the FIR (First Information Report)

A

Section 354A for the offence of sexual harassment

B

Section 354C for the offence of voyeurism

C

Section 3540 for the offence of stalking

D

Section 509

Who cannot claim maintenance under Section 125 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 from a person having sufficient means, who neglects or refuses to maintain him/her:

A

Father and mother unable to maintain themselves

B

Illegitimate minor child unable to maintain himself

C

Wife unable to maintain herself

D

Brother unable to maintain himself

Which one of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Anticipatory Bail ⇔ Section 438, Criminal Procedure Code
2. Summary Dismissal of Appeal ⇔ Section 384, Criminal Procedure Code
3. Reference to High Court ⇔ Section 394, Criminal Procedure Code
4. Compounding of Offences ⇔ Section 320, Criminal Procedure Code

A

1, 2, and 3

B

1, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 4

D

2, 3 and 4

Find out the correct matches:
1. Section 228 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Framing of Charge
2. Section 227 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Discharge
3. Section 232 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Acquittal
4. Section 236 Criminal Procedure Code ⇔ Previous Acquittal

A

1, 2 only

B

2, 3 only

C

1, 2, 3 only

D

1, 2, 3 and 4

In which case it was held that second wife of a person, whose husband's first wife is alive cannot claim maintenance from her husband under Section 125 Criminal Procedure Code 1973?

Related Questions