Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

The provisions of O. 17, r 3 does not apply unless:
1. The hearing is adjourned on the application of a party to the suit, as distinguished from an adjournment by the court of its own motion
2. The hearing is adjourned on the application of the party who subsequently makes the default
3. The adjournment is granted to enable the party to produce his evidence, or to cause the attendance of his witness, or to perform any other act necessary to the further progress of the suit
4. The party fails to perform any of the acts for which the adjournmentwas granted within the time allowed by the court

The provisions of O. 17, r 3 does not apply unless:
1. The hearing is adjourned on the application of a party to the suit, as distinguished from an adjournment by the court of its own motion
2. The hearing is adjourned on the application of the party who subsequently makes the default
3. The adjournment is granted to enable the party to produce his evidence, or to cause the attendance of his witness, or to perform any other act necessary to the further progress of the suit
4. The party fails to perform any of the acts for which the adjournmentwas granted within the time allowed by the court Correct Answer All of these

Related Questions

To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
In a suit filed by the plaintiff, the defendant in his written statement has taken the objection of non-impleadment of necessary party. Despite such objection the plaintiff continued the suit and the suit finally was decreed. At the first appellate stage, the plaintiff withdraws the suit with liberty to file a fresh one on the same cause of action and subsequently filed a fresh suit. The period spent by the plaintiff in the earlier suit, under section 14 of Limitation Act is
Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts
In a contractual dispute between two parties A and B, A files a suit in New Delhi where the cause of action arose. Two days later, B files a suit in the same matter in Mumbai, where A is resident. The pendency of the first suit is not brought to the notice of the court in Mumbai. The court pronounces judgement in second suit before the first suit is decided. Would such decision operate as a bar on the court in New Delhi to try the suit any further?
Existence of two suits, by parties litigating under same title, one previously instituted which is pending at present and the other filed later, wherein a matter in issue in the subsequently filed suit is directly and substantially in issue in the other and the relief claimed in the subsequent suit can effectively, be passed by the court of previous instance. Which section of Code of Civil Procedure decides the fate of the subsequently filed suit and its proceeding?
Consider the following statements:
1. Where the High Court calls for the record of any case in its revisional jurisdiction, it operates as a stay of such case before the subordinate court.
2. No second appeal shall lie in money suits where the value of the subject matter does not exceed Rs. 25,000.
3. A plaintiff cannot be allowed by the court to sue afterwards for any relief omitted by him in the suit.
4. A plaintiff may relinquish any portion of his claim in order to bring the suit within the jurisdiction of any court.
Of the above statements:
The organizers of a fair projected a 25 percent increase in attendance this year over that of last year, but attendance this year actually decreased by 20 percent . what percent of the projected attendance was the actual attendance?
The organizers of a fair projected a 25 percent increase in attendance this year over that of last year, but attendance this year actually decreased by 20 percent. What percent of the projected attendance was the actual attendance?
The organizers of a fair projected a 25 percent increase in attendance this over that of last year but attendance this year actually decreased by 20 percent. What percent of the projected attendance was the actual attendance ?
A student requires 221 days attendance to appear in an examination. A students has 208 days attendance and is declared ineligible by 5% attendance. What is the percentage of attendance required to appear in the examination?