Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Conclusive proof of legitimacy' of a child born during the valid marriage is dealt under which Section of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?
"The DNA test cannot rebut the conclusive presumption envisaged under section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act. The parties can avoid the rigor of such conclusive presumption only by providing non-access which is a negative proof." It was so held in which case
Birth during subsistence of marriage is a conclusive proof of legitimacy. This provision is found which following Sections of the Indian Evidence Act?
Which Provision of the Evidence Act provides that birth during marriage is conclusive proof of legitimacy?
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is based on the principle that law favours legitimacy rather than bastardity of children. It is conclusive presumption and can be rebutted only on the ground of:
If a child is born within . . . . . . . . Days after the dissolution of a valid marriage, it is a conclusive proof of the legitimacy of the child
C child was born after dissolution of marriage between F and M. The legitimacy of child C will be taken as conclusive proof only when child C was born with . . . . . . . . days after dissolution.
When one fact is declared by the Indian Evidence Act to be conclusive proof of another, the court, on proof of one fact:
The rigor of conclusive presumption of legitimacy under Section 112 of the Indian Evidence Act can only be rebutted by: