Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In prosecution for an offence under section 376 of Indian Penal Code, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, or previous sexual experience, of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent is provided in which Section of Indian Evidence Act.

In prosecution for an offence under section 376 of Indian Penal Code, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, or previous sexual experience, of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent is provided in which Section of Indian Evidence Act. Correct Answer 146

Related Questions

Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
The following sentences form a paragraph. The first and the last sentences of the paragraph are given. The rest of the sentences are numbered as P, Q, R and S. These four parts are not given in their proper order. Read the sentences and choose the alternative that arranges them in the correct order. 1. Sexual favouritism and gender partiality/discrimination are often similarly perceived. P. At the workplace, when romance involves sexual favouritism, it is important to comprehend the cause and extent of the presence of such favouritism i.e. whether this favouritism can give way to other employees (who are not directly involved in the illicit relationship) for claiming themselves as the victims of sexual harassment. Q. However, many critics have befittingly differentiated the two. R. This concludes that sexual favouritism and gender partiality bear both direct and indirect implications for employees.  S. They delineate that sexual favouritism entangles the discerning grant of a gain or opportunity at the workplace; in contrast, sexual partiality/discrimination usually involves the restraining of benefits or opportunities dependent upon an individual's gender. 6. Whether favouritism on the basis of sex remains a legitimate shape of discrimination, or whether sexual favouritism stretches to the extent of a restricted form of sexual partiality, is an important question which can only be answered through comprehending the definition of sexual harassment.
Which of the following distinction(s) is/are not correct between public issue and rights issue? (A) In public issue, applications for shares are invited from the general public and in rights issue, the shares are offered to existing shareholders. (B) In public issue there is no question of any over-subscription and in rights issue the shares may be under subscribed or over subscribed leading to prorata allotment. (C) The price of public issue is generally less than the market price and in rights issue, the price is deliberately made less than the market price. (D) In a public issue, the communication of the issue is through prospectus or advertisements and in a rights issue the communication is between the company and the existing members of the company. Choose the most appropriate answer from the options given below:
Consider the following with reference to Article 18? (a) No title, not being a military or academic distinction, shall be conferred by the State. (b) The citizen of India shall accept any title from any foreign State. (c) No person who is not a citizen of India shall, while he holds any office of profit or trust under the State, accept without the consent of the President any title from any foreign State. (d) The person holding any office of profit or trust under the State shall, without the consent of the President, accept any present, emolument, or office of any kind from or under any foreign State.
Which of the following questions cannot be asked in cross examination?
1. Questions which are scandalous, but having the bearing on the question before the Court
2. In a proceeding of rape question as to the general immoral character of the victim
3. In a Civil proceeding, question to the witness whether he is a professional witness
4. Questions answer to which may tend directly or indirectly to incriminate the witness
During examination-in-chief of a case under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code, the victim denies the prosecution case. Under what provision of Indian Evidence Act, the victim may be asked leading questions by the Public Prosecutor?
Five politicians F, K, H, M and D not necessary in the same order conducted a meeting to put various issues like Budget, Employment, Poverty, Digitalization and Security. They all are sitting around a circular table facing center. F who is not the neighbor of H and K, puts issue on employment. H who is sitting between D and K puts issue on digitalization. M does not put issue on poverty. The one who puts issue on security sits immediate right of the one who puts issue on Budget. Determine the immediate neighbor of person who puts issue on digitalization?
To prove both the parts of the offence contemplated in Section 116 of the Indian Penal Code, which of the following must be proved by the prosecution?
1. To prove the first part, the accused did abet the offence either by instigation or by conspiracy or by intentional aiding or by illegal omission.
2. To prove the first part, the offence was such which is punishable with imprisonment.
3. To prove the second part, the person abetted was a public servant during the period he was abetted.
4. To prove the second part, it was the duty of such public servant to prevent the commission of such an offence.
Consider the following statement(s).
A police officer has the power to arrest any person without an order from a magistrate or warrant of arrest, if he has reason to suspect his complicity in a cognizable offence punishable with imprisonment which may extend to seven years, provided that he is satisfied for reasons in writing that such arrest is necessary
1. To prevent such person from committing any further offence.
2. For proper investigation of the offence.
3. To prevent such person from tampering with or causing the evidence of the offence to disappear.
4. To compel the absconding co-accused to surrender.
Which of the statements given above are correct?