Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

During examination-in-chief of a case under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code, the victim denies the prosecution case. Under what provision of Indian Evidence Act, the victim may be asked leading questions by the Public Prosecutor?

During examination-in-chief of a case under Section 325 of Indian Penal Code, the victim denies the prosecution case. Under what provision of Indian Evidence Act, the victim may be asked leading questions by the Public Prosecutor? Correct Answer Section 154

Related Questions

Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
In prosecution for an offence under section 376 of Indian Penal Code, where the question of consent is an issue, it shall not be permissible to adduce evidence or to put questions in the cross examination of the victim as to the general immoral character, or previous sexual experience, of such victim with any person for proving such consent or the quality of consent is provided in which Section of Indian Evidence Act.
In an international school, 60% of the staff is of teachers and 40% of teachers are earning more than Rs.37,325. If 50% of the school's staff earn more than Rs.37,325 per year, then find which statement is correct. a) Percentage of administrative staff earn Rs.37,325 or less per year is less than 30%. b) Percentage of administrative staff earn Rs.37,325 or less per year is more than 30%. c) Percentage of administrative staff earn Rs.37,325 or less per year is exactly 30%. Select the correct answer.
Which two classes use the Shape class correctly?
A. public class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; }B. public abstract class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; }C. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }D. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw(); }E. public class Circle extends Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }F. public abstract class Circle implements Shape { private int radius; public void draw() { /* code here */ } }
"The Public Prosecutor or Assistant public Prosecutor in-charge of a case may with the consent the Court, at any time before the judgment is pronounced withdraw from the prosecution of any person either generally or in respect of anyone or more of the offences for which he is tried." This is related with which of the following Section of the Code of Criminal Procedure?
Which of the following combinations are correctly matched?
1. Harbour ⇔ Section 51A, Indian Penal Code
2. Wrongful Loss ⇔ Section 23, Indian Penal Code
3. Gang rape on woman under twelve years of age ⇔ Section 376DB, Indian Penal Code
4. Gang rape ⇔ Section 376D, Indian Penal Code
Select the correct answer:
Any Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of a case may before the judgement is pronounced, withdraw from the prosecution of any person. For this he has to take consent of:
Which of the following statements is correct?
(A) The presumption under Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act would be attracted, if the marriage of the accused and the deceased took place more than 7 years prior to the suicide of the woman and cruelty soon before death is established by the prosecution.
(B) That because Section 113-A of the Indian Evidence Act is attracted to a case, the prosecution is not required to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt against the accused.
In a case the accused was convicted u/s. 325 Indian Penal Code and was sentenced by trial Court to two months R. I. (Regorous Imprisonment) with fine of Rs. 500 for offence under S. 325 Indian Penal Code The trial pended for seven long years.