X' and 'Y' are jointly tried for murder of 'Z' It is proved that 'X' said - Y and I murdered 'Z' This confession of 'X':

X' and 'Y' are jointly tried for murder of 'Z' It is proved that 'X' said - Y and I murdered 'Z' This confession of 'X': Correct Answer May be taken into consideration against Y

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

A' and 'B' are jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. It is proved that 'A' said, "B and I murdered C" What is the nature of confession against 'B'?
The illustration that, "A and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. It is proved that A said, 'B and I murdered C'," relates
A and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. Confession of B recorded long after the murder allegedly committed in pursuance of a conspiracy would be-
Indian Evidence Act: 'A' and 'B' were jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. During the trial 'A' said . . . . . . . . "B" and I murdered 'C'. What is the nature of this evidence against 'B'?
A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is
Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?
Proposition of the Law of Evidence is that
1. Proceedings of Legislature may be proved by the records certified by a member present in the proceedings.
2. Acts of the Central Government may be proved by the records of the department, certified by heads of the departments.
3. Acts of the state may be proved by the document purporting to be printed by the order of such Government.
4. Acts of the State Government may be proved by records of the department certified by the head of the corresponding department of the Central Government.
Choose the correct assertion based on the following propositions:
Propositions:
1. Statement is a genus; admission is a species while confession is a subspecies
2. Statement and admission are species while confession is a sub-species.
3. Statement and admission are genus while confession is a species.
Assertions:
Propositions under Evidence Act are:
1. Statement is a genus, admission is a species & confession is a sub species
2. Statement & admission are species & confession is a sub species
3. Statement & admission are genus & confession is a species
In this context which of the following is correct:
A rustic woman in apprehension of assault and maltreatment makes a confession for murder of her mother-in-law at the Village Panchayat. Whether this confession is admissible?