Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is

A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is Correct Answer Not to be taken into consideration as 'A' and 'B' are not being jointly tried

Related Questions

Indian Evidence Act: 'A' and 'B' were jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. During the trial 'A' said . . . . . . . . "B" and I murdered 'C'. What is the nature of this evidence against 'B'?
Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?
Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
The question below is followed by three statements I, II and III. You have to determine whether the data given is sufficient for answering the question. You should use the data and your knowledge of mathematics to choose the best possible answer. How many runs Sachin scored against Kashmir? I. The difference between his score against Mumbai and against Delhi is equal to the difference between the score against Delhi and against Kashmir. II. The average run he scored against all three states Delhi, Kashmir and Mumbai is 100. III. He scored 25 runs more against Mumbai than Kashmir.
There is a hint in this question and a statement is given later. Carefully read the excerpts provided and determine the statement based on that episode. The current Australian team has lost three of their last five Test series. They lost their last two Test series, one of which was against Pakistan, which is not considered to be a strong team now. Australia's two best batsman, Steve Smith and David Warner are currently suspended and their absence has weakened the Australian team. There is a lot of dissatisfaction and introspection about how their national team plays in Australia, how they show aggression on the field, how they do not show respect to the team against them, and neglecting the media at the most, and focusing only on winning only, the discussion on the future of the game is ongoing. There are. Australian cricket never reached such a low level. This is the best opportunity to knock them into their own house. In other words, if this India could not beat Australia in Australia in this series, then it would prove that the campaign around this team is only the same: the propaganda. Legislation: The current Australian team won two of the last five Tests they played. Choose the right one from the next option A - The statement is completely true. B - Statement is most true. C - There is no definitive definition based on C-statement. D- Statement is completely false.
There is a hint in this question and a statement is given later. Carefully read the excerpts provided and determine the statement based on that episode. The current Australian team has lost three of their last five Test series. They lost their last two Test series, one of which was against Pakistan, which is not considered to be a strong team now. Australia's two best batsman, Steve Smith and David Warner are currently suspended and their absence has weakened the Australian team. There is a lot of dissatisfaction and introspection about how their national team plays in Australia, how they show aggression on the field, how they do not show respect to the team against them, and neglecting the media at the most, and focusing only on winning only, the discussion on the future of the game is ongoing. There are. Australian cricket never reached such a low level. This is the best opportunity to knock them into their own house. In other words, if this India could not beat Australia in Australia in this series, then it would prove that the campaign around this team is only the same: the propaganda. Statement: India has a good chance of defeating Australia. Choose the right one from the next option A - The statement is completely true. B - statement is most true. There is no definitive definition based on C-statement. D-statement is completely false.
Which of the following commands will display the current IP addressing and the layer 1 and 2 status of an interface?
1. show version
2. show protocols
3. show interfaces
4. show controllers
5. show ip interface
The average weight of 20 contestants in a fashion show increased by 5.75 kg when one of the contestants left the show but when a new contestant joined the show then the average weight decreased by 2.75 kg. What is the difference between the weight of the new contestant who joined the show and the contestant who left the show?
A is accused of a child's murder. The following facts are constructed in the case:
1. An hour before the murder, A went to the place of murder with the child.
2. A alone returned home.
3. Collar of A's shirt found to be blood-stained.
The evidence which takes into account the above-mentioned facts is called: