A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is

A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is Correct Answer Not to be taken into consideration as 'A' and 'B' are not being jointly tried

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Indian Evidence Act: 'A' and 'B' were jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. During the trial 'A' said . . . . . . . . "B" and I murdered 'C'. What is the nature of this evidence against 'B'?
Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?
Each material circumstance appearing in evidence against the accused must be put to the accused specifically, distinctly and separately. In this context, the propositions are
1. Failure to put the material evidence to the accused always vitiates the trial
2. Failure to put the material evidence amounts to a serious irregularity which can not be cured and vitiates the trial, if it has prejudiced the accused.
3. Failure to put the material evidence is not considered to services & is curable if infact no failure of justice has occasioned to the accused.
Now which of the following is correct
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
Which of the following commands will display the current IP addressing and the layer 1 and 2 status of an interface?
1. show version
2. show protocols
3. show interfaces
4. show controllers
5. show ip interface
A is accused of a child's murder. The following facts are constructed in the case:
1. An hour before the murder, A went to the place of murder with the child.
2. A alone returned home.
3. Collar of A's shirt found to be blood-stained.
The evidence which takes into account the above-mentioned facts is called:
Directions : In each of the following questions a statement is given, followed by two conclusions. Give answer :

Statement : To investigate the murder of the lone resident of a flat, the police interrogated the domestic servant, the watchman of the multi-storeyed buildings and the liftman.

Assumptions :
I. The domestic servant, watchman and the liftman can give a clue about the suspected murder.
II. Generally in such cases the persons known to the resident are directly or indirectly involved in the murder.
X is charge for murder of Y. About a month before the murder Y had attempted to rape the wife of X, X has an altercation with Y immediately before murder X is:
Which one of the following statements is correct?
In a trial of 'A' for the murder of 'B', marks on the ground produced by a struggle at or near the place of murder is a fact
In a trial, while explaining any circumstances appearing in evidence against him, an accused of committing murder states that due to grave and sudden provocation he was deprived of the power of self-control and thus, gave a single lathi blow to A, causing his death. The burden to prove grave and sudden provocation is on: