A' and 'B' are jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. It is proved that 'A' said, "B and I murdered C" What is the nature of confession against 'B'?

X' and 'Y' are jointly tried for murder of 'Z' It is proved that 'X' said - Y and I murdered 'Z' This confession of 'X':

A

May be taken into consideration against Y

B

May not be taken into consideration against Y because confession was made by 'X'

C

May be taken into consideration or not depends upon facts of case

D

None of the above is correct proposition of law

Indian Evidence Act: 'A' and 'B' were jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. During the trial 'A' said . . . . . . . . "B" and I murdered 'C'. What is the nature of this evidence against 'B'?

A

Substantive evidence

B

Corroborative evidence

C

Hearsay evidence

D

Direct evidence

The illustration that, "A and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. It is proved that A said, 'B and I murdered C'," relates

A

Section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act

B

Section 24 of the Indian Evidence Act

C

Section 25 of the Indian Evidence Act

D

Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act

A and B are jointly tried for the murder of C. Confession of B recorded long after the murder allegedly committed in pursuance of a conspiracy would be-

A

Inadmissible in evidence

B

Admissible in evidence under Section 10

C

Admissible in evidence under Section 30

D

Admissible in evidence both under Section 10 and 30

A' is on trial for the murder of 'C'. There is evidence to show that 'C' was murdered by 'A' and 'B', and that 'B' said-'A' and I murdered 'C'. As against 'A', this evidence is

A

Not to be taken into consideration as the evidence is hearsay

B

To be taken into consideration as it is direct

C

Not to be taken into consideration as 'A' and 'B' are not being jointly tried

D

To be taken into consideration as 'A' and 'B' are accomplices

Atif is charged with the murder of Khuda Baksh on the 21^st January, 1882. In fact, the murdered person's name was Haidar Baksh, and the date of the murder was the 20^th January, 1882. Atif was never charged with any murder but one, and had heard the inquiry before the Magistrate, which referred exclusively to the case of Haidar Baksh. What will the Court infer from this while applying Section 215 Criminal Procedure Code?

A

The Court may infer from these facts that Atif was not misled and that the error in the charge was immaterial

B

The Court may infer from these facts that Atif was misled and that the error in the charge was immaterial

C

The Court may infer from these facts that Atif was misled and that the error in the charge was material

D

None of them

A confession made by a conspirator involving other members is relevant against the co-conspirator jointly tried with him and is admissible

A

Under section 8 of Evidence Act

B

Under section 10 of Evidence Act

C

Under section 30 of Evidence Act

D

Both B and C

Proposition of the Law of Evidence is that
1. Proceedings of Legislature may be proved by the records certified by a member present in the proceedings.
2. Acts of the Central Government may be proved by the records of the department, certified by heads of the departments.
3. Acts of the state may be proved by the document purporting to be printed by the order of such Government.
4. Acts of the State Government may be proved by records of the department certified by the head of the corresponding department of the Central Government.

A

1 and 2 are not true

B

2 and 3 are not true

C

3 and 4 are not true

D

1 and 4 are not true

Choose the correct assertion based on the following propositions:
Propositions:
1. Statement is a genus; admission is a species while confession is a subspecies
2. Statement and admission are species while confession is a sub-species.
3. Statement and admission are genus while confession is a species.
Assertions:

A

1 is correct, 2 and 3 are incorrect

B

1 and 2 are correct and 3 is incorrect

C

1 and 3 are correct and 1 is incorrect

D

3 is correct and 1 and 2 are incorrect

Propositions under Evidence Act are:
1. Statement is a genus, admission is a species & confession is a sub species
2. Statement & admission are species & confession is a sub species
3. Statement & admission are genus & confession is a species
In this context which of the following is correct:

A

1 is correct, 2 and 3 are incorrect

B

1 and 2 are correct and 3 is incorrect

C

2 and 3 are correct and 1 is incorrect

D

3 is correct and 1 and 2 are incorrect

A' and 'B' are jointly tried for the murder of 'C'. It is proved that 'A' said, "B and I murdered C" What is the nature of confession against 'B'?

Related Questions