Which of the following is not necessary to constitute abetment by conspiracy?

Abetment may include:
1 Abetment by instigation
2. Abetment by conspiracy
3. Abetment by aid
4. Abetment by acquiescence and
5. Abetment by silence:

A

Only the first three constitute abetment

B

All the five constitute abetment

C

Only the first four amount to abetment

D

Only 2, 4 and 5 amount to abetment

Match list - I with list - II and choose the correct answer from the code given below - List - I List - II (A) Howrah Conspiracy case (i) Master Ami Chand (Amir Chand) (B) Lahore Conspiracy case (ii) Arvind Ghosh (C) Delhi Conspiracy case (iii) Jatindranath Mukherjee (D) Alipore Conspiracy case (iv) Rajguru

A

A-(iv), B-(iii), C-(ii), D-(i)

B

A-(i), B-(ii), C-(iii), D-(iv)

C

A-(iii), B-(iv), C-(i), D-(ii)

D

A-(ii), B-(iii), C-(iv), D-(i)

Consider the following statements.
To constitute abetment, it is:
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor
Which of the statements given above represent(s) the correct position of law?

A

Only B

B

Both B and C

C

Only A

D

Only C

Which of the following statements is not true with regard to Highways and Roads? (i) National Highways connect the state capitals, major cities, important ports, railway junctions, etc constitute about 1% of total road length in India. (ii) State Highways join the state capitals with district headquarters and other important towns constitute about 4% of total road length in India. (iii) District roads are the connecting link between District Headquarters and the other important nodes in the district and constitute about 14% of total road length in India. (iv) Rural roads are vital for providing links in rural areas and constitute about 80 per cent of the total road length in India

A

Only (ii)

B

Only (iii)

C

Only (iv)

D

None of the Above

Which of the following statements are correct in relation to criminal conspiracy?
1. When two or more persons agree to do an unlawful act by an unlawful means then they will be guilty of criminal conspiracy
2. Several persons agreed to commit an "offence" but nothing was done in pursuance of the agreement
3. When two or more persons agree to do a lawful act in lawful manner by lawful means but an overt act is done by one them
4. Criminal conspiracy to commit and offence punishable with fine alone will not entail any liability
Select the correct answer:

A

1, 3 and 4

B

2, 3 and 4

C

1, 2 and 4

D

1, 2 and 3

What is the basic difference between an offence of abetment by conspiracy and the offence of criminal conspiracy?

A

In case of conspiracy, mere agreement is enough whereas in case of abetment by conspiracy an act should have taken place in pursuance of conspiracy

B

There is no difference at all

C

In case of conspiracy, an act should also have taken place, but in case of abetment by conspiracy, no act needs to have taken place

D

In case of abetment by conspiracy, there need not be an agreement whereas in case of criminal conspiracy, agreement is essential

The offence of criminal conspiracy lies not in doing the act of effecting the purposes for which the conspiracy is formed but in the forming of the scheme between the parties. A criminal conspiracy consists of:

A

An intentional act of one person with the connivance of another

B

An agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act or a lawful act by unlawful means

C

Common intention of two or more persons to achieve an unlawful object

D

Two or more persons inducing a minor to commit an offence

(A) For the purpose of offence of abetment, it is not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
(R) Abetment is offence per se.

A

Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A)

B

Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A)

C

(A) is true and (R) is false

D

Both (A) and (R) are false

Under Indian Penal Code, 1860, which ingredient is not necessary to constitute an offence of abetment

A

Conspiracy

B

Intentional aid

C

Instigation

D

Act abetted should be committed

Consider the following statements:
To constitute abetmentit is
1. Necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
2. Not necessary that the act abetted must be committed.
3. Necessary that the person abetted must have the same intention or knowledge as that of the abettor.
Which of the statement given above represent(s) the correct position of law?

A

2 only

B

2 and 3

C

1 only

D

3 only

Which of the following is not necessary to constitute abetment by conspiracy?

Related Questions