Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

A public interest litigation is maintainable in which of the following cases?
1. A public interest litigation is filed contrary to the stand taken by those who were affected by the action
2. If public interest litigation is filed on a subject which was the subject matter of an earlier writ petition
Select the answer:

A public interest litigation is maintainable in which of the following cases?
1. A public interest litigation is filed contrary to the stand taken by those who were affected by the action
2. If public interest litigation is filed on a subject which was the subject matter of an earlier writ petition
Select the answer: Correct Answer 2 only

Related Questions

In a group of 450 students, 22% of the total students take the Hindi subject, 34% of the total students take the Physics subject, and 26% of the total students take the Social Science subject. 8% of the total students have taken both Hindi and Physics subject only. Out of the total students in the Hindi subject, 1/3 have taken both Hindi and Social Science subject only. Out of the total students in the Physics subject, 1/3 have taken both Physics and Social Science subject only. Only 20 students take all the three subjects. Find the number of students who have not taken any subject.  
In a stadium there are four stands Rajiv Gandhi stand, Sunil Gavaskar stand, Venkatesh Prasad stand and Pt. Din Dayal stand in which seats are alloted to commuters. The number of vacant  seats in Rajiv Gandhi stand, Sunil Gavaskar stand, Venkatesh Prasad stand and Pt. Din Dayal stand are 11, 8, 13 and 7 respectively. Anil is buying a ticket find the probability that he get a seat in Venkatesh Prasad stand.
A, a bank officer, got compulsorily retired in 2014. Since the bank authorities did not release the leave encashment in his favour, he filed writ petition WP 2001 (W) of 2017 in Ranchi High Court for the same and also for the interest on the unpaid amount. The writ petition was disposed of by a learned Single Judge in December 2018 directing the bank to release the privileged leave encashment benefits to the petitioner to the extent he was entitled to in accordance with law within a certain period. The prayer for interest was not specifically denied by the court. The bank filed an appeal against the order. The Division Bench of Ranchi High Court in February, 2019 declined to admit the appeal. The bank authorities released the leave encashment in favour of the petitioner. However, A files a writ petition again for a direction to the bank to disburse interest to A at the rate of 18% per annum on leave encashment released by the bank. This petition is covered under which of the following?
Which of the following combinations are not correctly matched?
1. Writ of Habeas Corpus: available against private individuals as well
2. Writ of Quo Warranto: available against subordinate courts only
3. Writ of Certiorari: available against state only
4. Writ of Prohibition: available against autonomous bodies only
Select the correct answer:
Consider the following statements with reference to Public Interest Litigations (PILs). 1. Public Interest Litigation purely based on newspaper reports are maintainable in courts. 2. PIL need not be filed by the aggrieved party only. 3. PILs can help develop the law by giving judges the opportunity to interpret legislation. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
In a survey of 25 students, it was found that 15 had taken Mathematics, 12 had taken Physics and 11 had taken Chemistry, 5 had taken Mathematics and Chemistry, 9 had taken Mathematics and Physics, 4 had taken Physics and Chemistry and 3 had taken all the three subjects. Find the number of students who had taken both Physics and Chemistry but not Mathematics.
In a survey of university students, 64 had taken Drama course, 94 had taken Dance course, 58 had taken a Singing course, 28 had taken Drama and singing course, 26 had taken Drama and dance course, 22 had taken Dance and singing course, and 14 had taken all the three courses. Find how many have taken only one course?
When a writ is issued to an inferior court or tribunal on grounds of exceeding its jurisdiction or acting contrary to the rules of natural justice it is called a writ of:
Assertion (A): Refusal to issue a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 does not bar the remedy for a similar writ under Article 32.
Reason (R): The rule of res judicata is not applicable to the writ of habeas corpus.
"If the writ petition under Article 226 in a High Court is dismissed on the merits (i.e. dismissed in limine); but because of laches of the party applying for the writ or because it is held that the party had an alternative remedy available to it, then dismissal of writ petition (under Article 226) would not constitute a bar to a subsequent petition under Article 32." This principle was laid down by Supreme Court in: