Which of the following Articles of the 'Constitution' relate to the doctrine, if a person is tried and acquitted or convicted of an offence, he cannot be tried again for the same offence?

Which of the following Articles of the 'Constitution' relate to the doctrine, if a person is tried and acquitted or convicted of an offence, he cannot be tried again for the same offence? Correct Answer Article 20(2)

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

Which one of the following Sections of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 provides that a person once convicted or acquitted cannot be tried again for the same offence?
A man purchases articles and markup its price by 80%. While selling, he gives certain offers. If a person buys only 1 article, then no discount is given but if a person buys 2 articles, then a discount of 20% is given on 2nd article and 40% discount on each 2nd and 3rd article if a person buys 3 articles. What is the profit percentage of man if he sells 2 articles to person A and 3 articles to person B?
A man purchases articles and markup its price by 80%. While selling, he gives certain offers. If a person buys only 1 article, then no discount is given but if a person buys 2 articles, then a discount of 20% is given on 2nd article and 40% discount on each 2nd and 3rd article if a person buys 3 articles. What is the profit percentage of the man if he sells 2 articles to person A and 3 articles to person B?
Which one of the following Sections of the Code of Criminal Procedure prohibits again trial of a person who has been tried by a court of competent jurisdiction for an offence and convicted or acquitted of such offence?
If an accused is charged of a major offence, but on the facts established he cannot be held guilty of that major offence. At the same time the facts established indicates that the minor offence has been committed, the person so tried for major offence can be convicted for such minor offence, it has been so provided
Which one of the following sections of the Criminal Procedure Code provides that a person once convicted or acquitted shall not be tried again for the same offence?
A person 'Y' is convicted for the offence of kidnapping in 1960 and sentenced to three years of imprisonment. On release from the Tihar Jail, he is apprehended and detained for commission of murder and tried and convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in 1990. Is this a violation of Article 20 of the Constitution of India?
PRINCIPLES: 1. Nothing is an offence which is done in the exercise of the right of private defense.
2. When an act, which would otherwise be a certain offence, is not that offence, by reason of the youth, the want of maturity of understanding, the unsoundness of mind or the intoxication of that person or by reason of misconception on the part of that person, every person has the same right of private defense against that act, which he would have if that act were an offence.
3. Everyone has the right to defend their life and property against criminal harm provided it is not possible to approach public authorities and more harm than that is necessary has not been caused to avert the danger.
4. If in the exercise of right of private defense against an assault which reasonably causes the apprehension of death, the defender be so situated that he cannot effectually exercise that right without risk of harm to an innocent person, his right of private defense extends to the running of that risk.
5. The right of private defense continues as long as apprehension of danger continues.
FACT: A enters by night a house which he is legally entitled to enter. Z, in good faith, taking A for a housebreaker, attacks A.
A shopkeeper sold two articles ‘X’ and ‘Y’ to person A for a total of Rs. 2000. Person A sold article ‘X’ at 10% loss and article ‘Y’ at 40% profit to person B. If person B purchased both the articles for a total of Rs. 2400, then what will be the cost price of both the articles for person A?
A (a 25 year old man) was B's (a 23 year old woman) neighbour. He fell in love with her and wanted to ask her to enter into a relationship with him. He sent her a number of text messages proclaiming his love for her. She did not respond to his overtures. On November 18, 2013, A went to B's house and told her that he was in love with her, and wanted to marry her. She told him that she was not interested and asked him to leave. A believed that B was only playing hard to get, and if he persisted, she would change her mind. On November 25, 2013, when B was returning home from her workplace, A met her again and proclaimed his love for her again. She again told him that she was not interested, and threatened to complain to the police. In spite of this, a week later, when B was leaving for work, she noticed that A was waiting outside her house, with a bouquet of flowers, and he tried to give her the flowers. B ignored him once again, and went to the police station to complain about A's acts. Under what Section of the Indian Penal Code should the police register the FIR (First Information Report)