Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

In the question three statements are given, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true even if it seems to be at variance from commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement I: Some milk is curd. Statement II: All curds are tofu. Statement III: All buttermilk is curds. Conclusion I: No buttermilk is tofu. Conclusion II: Some milk is buttermilk is a possibility. Conclusion III: No milk is tofu.
Monica Berg is a Norwegian bartender, she has 2 glasses of  mocktails. The first contains 25% champagne and the rest fruit beer. The second contains 50% champagne. How much beer should she mix from each of the containers so as to get 12 liters of fruit beer such that the ratio of champagne to beer is 3 ∶ 5?
Consider the following statements about Bioprocess/Fermentation: 1. Lactobacillus converts milk to curd. 2. Saccharomyces cerevisiae is used in baking. Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully and decide which of the conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: All scientists working in Japan are talented. Some Chinese scientists are working in Japan. Conclusions: I. No Chinese scientist is talented. II. Some talented Chinese scientists are working in Japan. III. All talented scientists are Japanese. IV. Some Chinese scientists are talented.
Choose the conclusion which logically follows from the given statement(S) Statement: All scientist working in America are talented. Some Indian scientists are working in America. Conclusions: 1. None of Indian scientists is talented. 2. Some talented Indian scientists have migrated to America. 3. All talented scientists are Indians. 4. Some Indian scientists are talented. The conclusion(s) correctly drawn is/are
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement: World’s largest beer maker Heineken NV, the majority partner of United Breweries with Vijay Mallya, is understood to have sought legal opinion over its right to appoint a chairman at the Indian company. Heineken and some of its advisers believe that the shareholder agreement between Mallya and the beer giant has become null and void after India’s Enforcement Directorate attached his shares as part of its legal action against the liquor baron. Which among the following arguments support the above statement in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. UBL has stopped sharing confidential information with Mallya and has said that he is no longer privy to any strategic developments.  II. The board of UBL, India’s biggest beer company, had asked Mallya to either step down or appoint a nominee after the Securities and Exchange Board of India barred wilful defaulters from holding key board positions last year.  III. The company is functioning well and operations are in good shape but it is not good corporate governance to have an acting chairman for so long.
A bacterial culture (200 μL containing 1.8 × 109 cells) was treated with an antibiotic Z (50 μg per mL) for 4 h at 37°C. After this treatment, the culture was divided into two equal aliquots.
Set A: 100 μL was plated on Luria agar.
Set B: 100 μL was centrifuged, the cell pellet washed and plated on Luria agar.
After incubating these two plates for 24 h at 37°C, Set A plate showed no colonies, whereas the Set B plate showed 0.9 × 109 cells. This experiment showed that the antibiotic Z is
The profiles of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are same.
The scientific name of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae, or “sugar-eating fungus” is given to which one of the following kitchen ingredient?
Which of the following is not reclassified into Saccharomyces cerevisiae?