Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

In the question below are given two statements followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts. Statements: I. All man are rich II. Only a few rich are good Conclusions: I. Some rich are not good II. All good is rich
Ramesh is richer than Satish but Jaya is less rich than Ramesh. Ram is less rich than Jaya but richer than Satish, but is not as rich as Ramesh. Ramesh is less rich than Navin. The richest amongst them is?
Sentences of a paragraph are given below in jumbled order. Arrange the sentences in the right order to form a meaningful and coherent paragraph. A. While the leaders of an oligarchy need not be rich to command control. B. Thus, plutocracies are always oligarchies, but oligarchies are not always plutocracies. C. The terms oligarchy and plutocracy are often confused. D. The leaders of a plutocracy are always wealthy.
Below are given four statements followed by four conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they appear to be at variance with commonly known facts, and then decide which of conclusions logically follows from the given statements. For each question, mark out an appropriate answer choice that you think is correct. Statements: Some kind are intelligent. Some cruel are kind. All cruel are people. No people is an animal. Conclusions: I. No cruel is an animal. II. Some kind are not an animal. III. Some kind are not intelligent. IV. All animals are intelligent.
Read the given statements and conclusions carefully. Assuming that the information given in the statements is true, even if it appears to be at variance with commonly known facts, decide which of the given conclusions logically follow(s) from the statements. Statements: Some athletes are businessmen. All businessmen are rich. Conclusions: I. Some athletes are rich. II. No athlete is rich.
The statement given below is followed by two arguments. You have to decide which argument(s) is/are strong. Statements: Food rich in protein is better than junk food. Arguments: I. Yes, food rich in protein is good for the mental and physical development of children. II. No, junk food is tastier than food rich in protein.
Which of the following statements regarding soil is/are correct? 1. Alluvial soils are rich in nitrogen content. 2. Black soils are rich in iron and lime but deficient in nitrogen. 3. Laterite soils are rich in iron and aluminium but deficient in nitrogen and potassium. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements: Some teachers are rich. All diabetics are rich. Conclusions: 1. Some diabetics are teachers. 2. Some rich people are diabetic.
Which of the following statements regarding soil is/are correct? 1.Alluvial soils are rich in nitrogen content. 2.Black soils are rich in iron and lime but deficient in nitrogen. 3.Laterite soils are rich in iron and aluminium but deficient in nitrogen and potassium. Select the correct answer using the code given below.
Consider the given statement as true and decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements. Statements : Some teachers are rich. All diabetics are rich. Conclusions : 1. Some diabetics are teachers. 2. Some rich people are diabetic.