Two persons voluntarily took lift in a jeep were thrown out and sustained injuries due to the giving way of the bolts, fixing the right front wheel and thereby toppling the jeep. Principle of volenti non fit injuria was held to be not applicable to them in

Two persons voluntarily took lift in a jeep were thrown out and sustained injuries due to the giving way of the bolts, fixing the right front wheel and thereby toppling the jeep. Principle of volenti non fit injuria was held to be not applicable to them in Correct Answer Padmavati v. Dugganaika

Related Questions

Principle: A master is liable for the wrongful act of his servants committed in the course of employment.
Facts: 'A' employed 'B' to drive his jeep. 'B' took the jeep from the workshop and thereafter, instead of taking the jeep to the garage, went on a spree, and on the way, he gave joy ride to some unauthorized persons. 'B's negligence caused an accident resulting in injuries to all the unauthorized persons in the vehicle. Can they claim damages from 'A'?
Principle: When a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.
Factual Situation: A, B, C and D who were unemployed, decided to loot the house of a rich businessman one night. When all of them were about to jump the Compound wall, D decided to remain at the gate and warn them, in case of any problem. A, B and C entered the house and took cash and gold ornaments. While coming out of the house B tripped on a rubber hose pipe creating a sound. By this the watchman who had otherwise asleep woke up. B suddenly took the rubber hose and strangled the watchman's neck thus killing him. Later all A, B, C and D were arrested and prosecuted.