Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Any party may address oral arguments in his case and before the conclusion of oral arguments can submit written arguments and such written arguments

Any party may address oral arguments in his case and before the conclusion of oral arguments can submit written arguments and such written arguments Correct Answer Shall form part of record

Related Questions

The propositions are: Under Order XVIII, Rule 2 of Code of Civil Procedure
1. Written arguments can be filed before the conclusion of oral arguments
2. A copy of the written arguments shall be punished simultaneously to the other party
3. Adjournment shall be granted generally for the purpose of filing the written arguments
4. the Court cannot fix any time-limit for oral arguments
Which of the following is correct in respect of the aforesaid propositions:
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should banks provide special loans to farmers? Arguments: I. Yes, as with that amount the farmer would be able to afford modern equipment’s which will increase his earnings. II. No, because people may take advantage of this, even those who can afford to pay may not.
Which pair is correct for 'Types of Political Party - Name of Political Party'? I. National Party - Communist Party of India II. State Party - Aam Aadmi Party III. State Party - All India Trinamool Congress IV. National Party - Indian National Congress
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.
Two statement are given below, followed by three conclusions, I, II and III. You have to consider the statement to be true even if it seems to be at variance with commonly known facts. You have to decide which of the given conclusions, if any, follows from the given statements. Statement 1: Every man should have his identity card with him Statement 2: That card should mention his blood group, complete address and telephone number for contact, in case of emergencies. Conclusion I: Blood CANNOT be transfused until its group is mentioned in the card. Conclusion II: No one is supposed to forget his phone number under any circumstances Conclusion III: The police needs this information if the injury is fatal.
A member of Parliament can be disqualified on the ground of dejection if
1. He leaves the party as a result of split in the party along with members who constitute only 1/3rd of the total membership of that party
2. A nominated member joins any political party after the expiry of 6 months from the date on which he takes his seat in the House
3. He gives up membership of the political party on whose ticket he is elected
4. He votes or abstains from voting in the House against the direction of political party without prior permission
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong' arguments and which is/are ‘weak' arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question. Statement:  The central government has told the Supreme Court that anti-adultery laws were required to protect the ‘sanctity of marriage and the institution of family', and any attempt to do away with these laws would hurt ‘Indian ethos'. The government was responding to a court notice on a public interest litigation which wanted the law struck down as it was not gender neutral and the provisions were tilted against men. Which among the following arguments support the above statement regarding the ‘revision of such laws' in the best possible manner? Arguments: I. It seemed to suggest that women were chattel owned by men and could be guided and misguided. II. This would erode the sanctity of marriage as an institution and the societal fabric. The issue of making the provision gender neutral was already pending before the government. III. Any step towards decriminalising the offence in the interim would be detrimental to Indian ethos which gives paramount importance to the institution and sanctity of marriage.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should women be given equal employment opportunities as men? Arguments: I. Yes, because they are equally talented as men and can fit into any position. II. No, because men are always one step ahead of women which makes them superior.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below are followed by two arguments each numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the two arguments is the strong argument and which is the weak argument. Statement: Should schools stop the practice of conducting debates? Arguments: Yes. Debating culture creates a feeling of resentment among children for the ones who oppose them. No. It inculcates the habit of critical thinking among children and improves their oral communication skills.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Should government ban Cigarette industries? Arguments: I. Yes, as it is very injurious for any person consuming them and causes cancer. II. No, forbidding them would mean that those people who work in cigarette industries would lose their jobs.