Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Given below is a word, followed by three sentences which consist of that word. Identify the sentence(s) which best express(es) the meaning of the word. Choose option 5 ‘None of these’ if the word is not suitable in any of the sentences. Corroborate A. Recent research seems to corroborate his theory. B. Employment trends corroborate the dismal economic picture. C. There was no one to corroborate her story about the disturbance in the lounge.
If a maker of dying declaration survives, his statement can be used under Indian Evidence Act, 1872:
1. As substantive evidence
2. To corroborate the testimony of maker if examined
3. To contradict the testimony of maker if examined
4. Cannot be used at all
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.
To constitute a matter of res judicata which of the following conditions must concur?
1. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit or issue must be the same matter which was directly and substantially in issue either actually (section 11, explanation III) or constructively (section 11, explanation IV) in the former suit
2. The former suit must have been a suit between the same parties under whom they or any of them claim. Explanation VI of Section 11 must be read with this condition
3. The parties as aforesaid must have litigated under the same title in the former suit
4. The court which decided the former suit must have been a court competent to try the subsequent suit of the suit in which such issue has been subsequently raised. Explanation II of section 11 is to be read with condition
5. The matter directly and substantially in issue in the subsequent suit must have been heard and finally decided by the court in the first suit. Explanation V of section 11 is to be read with this condition
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Pictures can tell a story. Fact 2: All storybooks have pictures. Fact 3: Some storybooks have both words and pictures. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Pictures can tell a story better than words can. II. The stories in storybooks are very simple. III. Some storybooks have both words and pictures. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Most stuffed toys are stuffed with beans. Fact 2: There are stuffed bears and stuffed tigers. Fact 3: Some chairs are stuffed with beans. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. Only children's chairs are stuffed with beans. II. All stuffed tigers are stuffed with beans. III. Stuffed monkeys are not stuffed with beans. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All chickens are birds. Fact 2: Some chickens are hens. Fact 3: Female birds lay eggs. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All birds lay eggs. II. Hens are birds. III. Some chickens are not hens. Choose the correct answer from the options given below: 
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: All hats have brims. Fact 2: There are black hats and blue hats. Fact 3: Baseball caps are hats. If the first three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. All caps have brims. II. Some baseball caps are blue. III. Baseball caps have no brims. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
The logic problems in this set present you with three true statements: Fact 1, Fact 2 and Fact 3. Then you are given three more statements (labelled I, II, III), and you must determine which of these, if any, is also a fact. One or two of the statements could be true; or none of the statements could be true. Fact 1: Jessica has four children. Fact 2: Two of the children have blue eyes and two of the children have brown eyes. Fact 3: Half of the children are girls. If the fist three statements are facts, which of the following statement/(s) must also be a fact? I. At least one girl has blue eyes. II. Two of the children are boys. III. The boys have brown eyes. Choose the correct answer from the options given below:
Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, in respect of confessional evidence
1. So much of the information as it relates distinctly to the fact discovered in consequence of information received from the person accused may be proved against him.
2. Person giving such information must be accused of an offence.
3. Accused need not be in the police custody.
4. Any statement of the accused confessing his guilt must be made in presence of a Magistrate, in all cases, whether anything is discovered or not in consequence of such statement, may be proved against him.