Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Related Questions

Indian Evidence Act: A witness may while under examination, refresh his memory by referring to any writing made by himself at the time of the transaction or soon afterwards. This provision is provided under
Select the incorrect statements:
1. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to arbitration proceedings.
2. The Indian Evidence Act does not apply to proceedings before a Commissioner appointed by the court for recording evidence
3. The Indian Evidence Act applies to affidavits presented to Courts
4. The Indian Evidence Act applies to judicial proceedings held before all kinds of military courts
If the succeeding Judicial magistrate is of opinion that further examination of any of the witnesses whose evidence has already been recorded, is necessary in the interests of justice, he may re-summon any such witness, and after such further examination, cross-examination and reexamination, if any, as he may permit, the witness shall be discharged." This provision is mentioned under section . . . . . . . . of Criminal procedure Code.
Consider the following statements:
1. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires two persons whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code require five persons.
2. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code requires common intention, whereas Section 149 of Indian Penal Code requires common object
3. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code both require presence of a prior consent
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and section 149 of Indian Penal Code. Both create specific offence
Which of the above statements are correct?
Under which section of the Indian Evidence Act a witness has been given right to refresh his memory
Carefully read following statements:
1. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of two persons, whereas under Section 149 of Indian Penal Code, requirement is of five persons.
2. According to Section 34 of Indian Penal Code, common intention is required whereas under Section 149 Indian Penal Code, common object is required
3. Previous consent is required under Section 34 & 149 of Indian Penal Code
4. Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Section 149 of Indian Penal Code constitutes a specific offence
Which of the above statements is true:
In an examination 30,000 candidates appeared from Gujarat, Exam is in three languages Hindi, English, Gujarati and (before starting examination candidate choose individual language and in between examination changing language is allowed), 53% of candidates complete the exam in English, 61% of candidate in Hindi, 60% of candidate in Gujarati, 24% of candidates complete examination in English and Hindi both, 27% of candidates complete examination in English and Gujarati both, 35% of candidates complete examination Hindi and Gujarati both. Find how many candidates complete the examination in single language?
An examination consists of four sections viz. Maths, Science, English and Hindi. Certain number of students registered for the examination in which 12% did not appear for the examination and 8% of the total registered students were not able to clear any section. 12.5% of the appeared students cleared only Maths section, 25% of the appeared students cleared only Maths and Science section. 13% of the total registered students cleared only Maths, Science and English section. If the remaining students who appeared for the examination are 51 and cleared all the four sections, then what is the total number of students who appeared for the examination? (Note: No other case is possible other than given in the question) 
With regard to computer memory, which of the following statement(s) is/are TRUE?  (A) Cache memory is 'volatile' memory. (B) Magnetic memory is 'volatile' memory.  (C) Flash memory is 'volatile' memory. (D) RAM is 'volatile' memory. Choose the correct answer from the option given below:
Choice the correct propositions:
1. Evidence of fingerprint expert is substantive evidence.
2. Evidence of fingerprint expert can be used only to corroborate some items of substantive evidence which are otherwise on record.
3. Evidence of fingerprint expert is not substantive evidence.
4. Evidence of fingerprint expert is admissible in all circumstances as expert evidence.