A' sells to 'B' by deed my estate at Raipur containing 200 bighas. "A" has an estate at Raipur containing 200 bighas. Whether evidence may be given of the fact that estate meant to be sold was one situated at a different place and of a different size:

A' sells to 'B' by deed my estate at Raipur containing 200 bighas. "A" has an estate at Raipur containing 200 bighas. Whether evidence may be given of the fact that estate meant to be sold was one situated at a different place and of a different size: Correct Answer No

Bissoy MCQ

Related Questions

X' executed a sale deed in favour of 'Y' on 1st January, 2002. Subsequently on 10th January, 2002, 'X' executed a sale deed in respect of the same property in favour of 'Z'. Thereafter the sale deed in favour of 'Z' executed on 10th January, 2002 was registered on 20th January, 2002. Whereas the sale deed in favour of 'Y' was registered on 30th January, 2002.
In the said case, by virtue of section 47
A executed a gift deed in favour of B with respect to an immovable property worth Rs. 90/-. The deed was duly attested but was not registered. B, in a suit, claimed title by virtue of the above gift deed. Is his claim maintainable?
A alleging that he is the adopted son of X, sues B to recover certain property granted to him by X, under a deed and forming part of X's estate. The court finds that A is not the adopted son of X, but he is entitled to the property under the deed and a decree is passed for A. The finding that A is not the adopted son of X:
A, alleging that he is the adopted son of X, sues B to recover certain property gran ted to him by X under a deed and forming part of the estate of X. The court finds that A is not the adopted son of X; but that he is entitled to the property under the deed and a decree is passed for A.