Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court directed closing down and demolition of shrimp Industries in coastal regulation zone and implement the "Precautionary principle "and "the polluter pays principle" and held them liable for payment of compensation for reversing the ecology and compensate the individual for loss suffered ?

In which of the following cases, the Supreme Court directed closing down and demolition of shrimp Industries in coastal regulation zone and implement the "Precautionary principle "and "the polluter pays principle" and held them liable for payment of compensation for reversing the ecology and compensate the individual for loss suffered ? Correct Answer S. Jaganath vs. Union of India

Related Questions

With reference to Coastal Plains of India, consider the following statements: 1. The western coastal plains are an example of emergent coastal plain while the Eastern coastal plains are the example of submerged coastal plains. 2. The rivers flowing through western coastal plain do not form any delta. 3. Easter coastal plains are more suitable for the development of good ports and harbors. Which of the above statements is NOT correct?
Consider the following statements regarding the Coastal Regulation Zones (CRZs) in India: Coastal Regulation Zones are defined under the Environment Protection Act, 1986. It includes an Intertidal zone and an area up to 500 meters from the High Tide Line (HTL). Projects related to the development of atomic energy are prohibited in the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZs). Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Which of the following sequence of Heat zones is/are correctly placed? A) Torrid zone, South temperate zone and Frigid zone. B) Torrid zone, North temperate zone and Frigid zone. C) South temperate zone, torrid zone and Frigid zone. Select the correct answer given below.
Which of the following statements are correct? Answer by using the code given below:
1. Persons in Govt/Judicial service need not resign to participate in District judge selection process held in "Vijay Kumar Misra and another v. High Court of Judicature at Patna" by the Supreme Court of India
2. The Supreme Court of India held in S. Kazi v. Muslim Education Society that " All Tribunals are not necessary parties to the proceedings where legality of its orders challenged"
3. The Supreme Court of India observed in Cardanumom Marketing Corporation and others v. State of Kerala and others that Social Security to the legal profession becomes an essential part of legal system
4. The Supreme Court of India held in 'Union of India v. Rajasthan High Court and others that High Court judges are exempted from Airport frisking.
A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court passes judgment in a matter. In a later case before a high court, a party presents the Supreme Court judgment as a binding authority. The opposing party claims that the high court is not bound by the Supreme Court's judgment because relevant provisions of law were not brought to the notice of the Supreme Court in that case. Which of the following is most correct in this case?
Principle: Article 141 of the Constitution provides that the law declared by the Supreme Court is binding on all courts within the territory of India.
A' was carelessly driving his car at 50 km/hr. at a busy street in the city and hit B injuring his leg. On these facts the Supreme Court of India held that 'A' is liable to pay compensation to 'B'. It means that the Supreme Court laid down the law that the injured party is entitled for compensation in all cases of:
Consider the following statements regarding safety during the demolition of a multistorey building :  1. Demolition need not proceed storey by storey  2. Flour openings, not used for material chutes, should be enclosed with adequate guard rails 3. Before demolition starts all lath and loose plaster shall be stripped off throughout the building  4. Adequate and well-stiffened lateral bracing shall be provided for walls  Which of the above statements are correct? 
On Comparing Indian and American Supreme Courts which one of the following statements is NOT true? Indian Supreme Courts original jurisdiction is confined to federal cases. Indian Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction is confined to constitutional cases only. American Supreme Court has a very wide discretion to grant special leave to appeal in any matter against the judgement of any court or tribunal (except military). American Supreme Court has no advisory jurisdiction.
Which among the following options are correct with respect to the coastal plains of India? 1. Eastern coastal plains are more fertile as compared to the western coastal plain 2. Eastern coastal plains are more narrower as compared to the western coastal plain
Which of the following subject matters Articles Related to Supreme Court is correctly stated with their respective Article no.?  133. Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court in appeals from High Courts in certain cases 132. Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court in appeals from High Courts in regard to civil matters 134 A. Appellate jurisdiction of Supreme Court in regard to criminal matters 134 . Certificate for appeal to the Supreme Court