Bissoy.com
Doctors Medicines MCQs Q&A

Consider the following statement (s) is/are related to the Chipko Movement.
1. It was launched from Gopeshwar in Chamoli district, Uttarakhand in 1973.
2.The movement was to prevent illegal cutting of trees in the Himalayan region (Uttarakhand).

Consider the following statement (s) is/are related to the Chipko Movement.
1. It was launched from Gopeshwar in Chamoli district, Uttarakhand in 1973.
2.The movement was to prevent illegal cutting of trees in the Himalayan region (Uttarakhand). Correct Answer Both 1 and 2

Related Questions

The Chipko movement started in Uttarakhand, this was a movement taken to protect the environment. It started in 1973 in Chamoli district. The farmers of the village fought this movement against the cutting of forests and jungles by state forest contractors. The people of the village wrestled with trees such that the contractors were not able to cut trees. There were several effects of this movement, few of which is given below. Which of the following, if true, would weaken the conclusion about the effects of chipko movement? 
Recently you are appointed as the head of a department that looks after conserving trees in the area and prevention of illegal transport of logs. While traveling by public bus you got a chance to hear a conversation between fellow passengers occupying the next seats. They were praising the work of your predecessor who is now promoted as the state-wide head of the department. According to their discussion, your predecessor was a very good person, who never took bribes and did not prosecute persons for cutting trees in the area. He never objected to cutting trees even though in many instances it was illegal. You would,
One-sixth of the trees in a garden are neem trees. Half of the trees are Ashoka trees and the remaining are eucalyptus trees. If the number of neem trees is five, then how many eucalyptus trees are there in the garden?
Consider the with different types of trees. Sohan has different types of trees in the field which are given in the table below: Names of trees Number of trees Neem ||| Papaya |||| Mango |||| || Coconut |||| Guava ||| Using the table, answer the question Neem, Papaya and Mango trees together is how many more than Coconut and Guava trees together?
Consider the following statement with respect to Himalayan rivers and the peninsular rivers. 1. Himalayan rivers are old and mature while peninsular rivers are youthful in the activity. 2. Himalayan rivers are perennial while peninsular rivers are seasonal in nature. 3. Himalayan rivers show meandering activity in the plains but peninsular rivers do not. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
With reference to the Himalayan Rivers and the Peninsular Rivers, consider the following statements: 1. The Himalayan Rivers are examples of consequent drainage while the Peninsular rivers are examples of antecedent drainage. 2. The Himalayan rivers flow through deep V-shaped valleys while the Peninsular rivers flow in comparatively shallow valleys. 3. The Himalayan rivers are perennial in nature while the Peninsular rivers are seasonal or non-perennial. Which of the statements given above is not correct?
One-sixth of the trees in a garden are jamun trees, half of the trees are Eucalyptus trees and the remaining are peepal trees.  If the number of jamun trees is 6, how many peepal tree are there in the garden? 
Compare the Himalayan river with the Peninsular river based on the following comparisons : 1. Most of the Himalayan rivers are perennial, whereas most of the Peninsular rivers are rainfed. 2. The gradient of the Himalayan river is steeper than the Peninsular river. 3. The Peninsular river causes more erosion on its way in comparison to the Himalayan river. Choose the correct answer from the options given below.
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong’ arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The questions below if followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a ‘strong’ argument is and which a ‘weak’ argument is. Statement: Is cutting down of forest trees affecting the environment? Arguments: I. Yes, deforestation has a direct impact on the natural climate change, thereby increasing global temperature. II. No, because cutting trees is required as wood is utilized in a lot of industries. 
Two statements are followed by three Conclusions I, II and III. You have to consider the statements to be true, even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. You are to decide which of the given conclusions can definitely be drawn from the given statements and indicate your answer accordingly. Statements: I. Political parties that opposed simultaneous polls before the Law Commission mostly cited federalism, Constitution and impracticability for their opposition, but Goa Forward Party chose coconuts to drive home its point against the proposal of ‘One Nation, One Election'. II. The regional party that is part of the BJP-led Goa government cited coconut, its party symbol, to argue that regional issues will go unaddressed in the noise of simultaneous polls. Conclusions: I. To buttress its reasoning, Goa Forward Party representative cited the party's history and struggle in protesting against cutting down of coconut trees in Goa before it came to power with ally BJP in March 2017. II. The party had protested against the BJP government's decision to amend rules to simplify the procedure of cutting down coconut trees by removing it from the list of trees. III. The commission held talks with political parties on the proposal of simultaneous elections.