In neighborhood operation for spatial filtering using square mask of n*n, which of the following approach is/are used to obtain a perfectly filtered result irrespective of the size?

In neighborhood operation for spatial filtering using square mask of n*n, which of the following approach is/are used to obtain a perfectly filtered result irrespective of the size? Correct Answer By ensuring that center of mask must be at a distance ≥ (n – 1)/2 pixels from border of image

By ensuring that center of mask must be at a distance ≥ (n – 1)/2 pixels from border of image, the resultant image would be of smaller size but all the pixels would be the result of the filter processing and so is a fully filtered result. In the other approach like padding affect the values near the edges that gets more prevalent with mask size increase, while the another approach results in the band of pixels near border that gets processed with partial filter mask. So, not a fully filtered case.

Related Questions

In neighborhood operation for spatial filtering if a square mask of size n*n is used it is restricted that the center of mask must be at a distance ≥ (n – 1)/2 pixels from border of image, what happens to the resultant image?
Which of the following gives an expression for high boost filtered image fhb, if f represents an image, f blurred version of f, fs unsharp mask filtered image and A ≥ 1?
Which of the following filtering is done in frequency domain in correspondence to lowpass filtering in spatial domain?